-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
&
"Sp!ke"
Guest
It s 7,62mm so body armour dosent count (sort of).
And its an automatic with a grenade launcher , and it probably has less recoil than the 551.
And its an automatic with a grenade launcher , and it probably has less recoil than the 551.
c+k|nEVeRmOre
~A.K.A. wesley_sniper~
striderteen
New Member
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Did you just say 7.62mm has LESS recoil than 5.56mm?? Think before posting!!!
A 5.56mm carbine might be less stable than a 7.62mm rifle, but the 7.62mm will still have MORE recoil since it is a bigger round -- it has more mass at comparable velocity, which means more momentum, which means more recoil.
c+k|nEVeRmOre
~A.K.A. wesley_sniper~
Striderteen, the SG551 is a very light gun with a short barrel, hence it is conceivable that the above mentioned 7.62mm battle rifle would have less recoil, since it has a longer barrel and weighs around 9 pounds (4.1 kg) with an empty mag, not to mention the added forward weight of the grenade launcher. Maybe you should think before you post 
striderteen
New Member
It'll jerk around more, it'll have more recoil effect, but the 7.62mm round will produce more recoil. The rifle may be better at absorbing and dissipating the recoil, hence the user feels less of a kick and jerk, but the actual recoil produced by the round firing is greater for the large-caliber rounds.
We're looking at the same thing two different ways; I'm talking about the recoil produced by the firing, and you're talking about the effective recoil experienced by the user.
We're looking at the same thing two different ways; I'm talking about the recoil produced by the firing, and you're talking about the effective recoil experienced by the user.
Actually, I think the correct designation is AG3-H1. (H1 means that it has a collapsible stock like the MP5.) Details, details...
Since the actual existence of such a thing as a human soul is doubtful to say the least (and this is - after all - Sp!ke we're talking about here
), I suggest Shakken take The_Fur's virgins, be happy and give us the G3! And the G3 has quite a kick compared to most 5.56mm rifles. (I've never tried an SG550/551 so I can't be 100% sure which has the heaviest recoil, but my money's on the G3.)
Are you sure those weren't HK33s? Or are we thinking about two different movies...
HK33EA2 - 5.56mm successor of the G3.
If there is such a thing as a beautiful assault rifle, the HK33 must be it! I just love that no-bullsh*t, solid-looking but sleek design! (Or maybe I'm just getting weird on my old days...)
hey Domino quit INF and play CS (no JUST KIDDING NEVER DO THAT!!!). That's the Benelli/Hk? 1107 semi-auto shotgun, it's in CS as a shotty with 7 shots and shoots hella-fast and hella-powerful. Cheapo's weapon.
You're either blind, stupid, or both.
If the huge operating handle sticking out of the reciever didn't give it away, nothing will. MOST of that team is using a Sig 551 or variant thereof. Just like the one in INF.
I dont think theres anything with the letters HK or the number 3 in them in that arsenal.
Kuroshio Apocal
Sucka Free
&
"Sp!ke"
Guest
About the ag-3 in the pro: I actually didnt notice this when I saw the movie , but it was one of the VERY few things my search engine found about AG-3...
striderteen
New Member
A reason not to use the AG-3...
....is that it's d*** heavy. Eleven pounds, and that's empty. Throw in a 20-round clip of 7.62mm ammo, and maybe that H&K 79 grenade launcher, and...
...and we have something that I, for one, would never want to haul across a battlefield.
....is that it's d*** heavy. Eleven pounds, and that's empty. Throw in a 20-round clip of 7.62mm ammo, and maybe that H&K 79 grenade launcher, and...
...and we have something that I, for one, would never want to haul across a battlefield.
Re: A reason not to use the AG-3...
Whimp!
I hauled one across most of central and south western Norway for a year, and I know exactly how heavy it is: light enough! And get this: WOMEN in the Norwegian armed forces are issued G3s as well, and they rarely - if ever - have problems with its weight!
Whimp!
I hauled one across most of central and south western Norway for a year, and I know exactly how heavy it is: light enough! And get this: WOMEN in the Norwegian armed forces are issued G3s as well, and they rarely - if ever - have problems with its weight!
Last edited:
