CAN'T DOWNLOAD! AGAIN!

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

Rincewind

New Member
Feb 17, 2000
5
0
0
Oulu, Finland
Visit site
****** ****** *************************!!! /infopop/emoticons\icon_wink.gif

I can't download the infiltration mod, because everytime I try to take it the browser just showes me a blank screen.

I posted about the same problem back in 02-17-2000, and got the answer to my question. But when I searched for it, I was told that that file is no longer on the server!
Is this some kind of a conspiracy against a poor fin that would finally like to get playing this game thank you very much!
 

Rincewind

New Member
Feb 17, 2000
5
0
0
Oulu, Finland
Visit site
I am on netscape. It just goes "Loading xxx...done" then nothing. AAAAAAAARGHHH! I finally get unreal, then I can't play the mod! (I have been waiting for 2 months for a friend of mine to finish playing UT, or rather get bored of it)
 

geogob

Koohii o nomimasu ka?
Get bored of it
confused.gif


what the f...! that's possible?

/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif


------------------
--- Geogob ---
The only way out is the C4 way

[This message has been edited by geogob (edited 04-13-2000).]
 

Omega SW

New Member
Mar 24, 2000
33
0
0
Illonois
Visit site
Neo? You use shitscape? HAHAHA, You athiest.
I think i misspelled that /infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

------------------
I am Omega(SW)FaL, I am the end...
 

Rincewind

New Member
Feb 17, 2000
5
0
0
Oulu, Finland
Visit site
WOHOO!!! I managed to download from the given address, but which one is which? Is "inf27z.zip" the manual zip? What is a Umod format? Do you need a special program for it? If so, where can you get it? What's the meaning of life?
 

Mr. T

New Member
Feb 20, 2000
608
0
0
Visit site
Well, in my experience, Windows 95/98 allows everything to crash Windows. But Windows NT 4.0 just allows everything to crash in on itself. It must use some form of crash containment technology. /infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif Everything can crash and usually does, but at least the OS keeps running. But maybe I've just been lucky.

I haven't used 2000.
 

Bad.Mojo

Commander in Chief o' the BMA
Mar 17, 2000
1,758
0
0
43
Ottawa, Ontario
Computers launch nukes. They run cities and powergrids. They automate hospitals. They fly planes.

Are these really things we want the word crash to be associated with? My goddam command prompt never crashed.

What the hell was wrong with DOS? 5.0 was a dream, dammit. The only time anything would "crash" in it was when you needed more ram, and all that meant was loading your autoexec and config sys one by frigging one.

Do we really wanna make computers user friendly? Isn't that like taking out crossing lights because the red hand is "mean"?
 

Corin

New Member
Jan 26, 2000
179
0
0
San Jose, CA
Visit site
I always did like DOS better than 3.11, I always liked 3.11 better than 95, I always liked NT better than 95, I always hated 98, and well, my Macintosh was always there for me
/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
 

Mr. T

New Member
Feb 20, 2000
608
0
0
Visit site
I doubt there are too many windows machines running powergrids and nuclear weapons control. If so, then there needs to be some serious mental health evaluations performed on the system admins.

You should see what they run on the Space Shuttle. It's about as far from user friendly as you can get. Mostly Hal/S and Assembler, all developed on an IBM mainframe. Very archaic, but a hell of a lot more reliable than the code behind Windows.

[This message has been edited by Mr. T (edited 04-15-2000).]