Opinion not based on viewership or post-convention polling. Not an argument.
Both of which are meaningless, so that's not a counter argument. Even if it were, viewership was no higher than it's been for previous events (actually it was the lowest since 2004), and convention polling from "speech listeners" is self-selective and doesn't represent the population at large.
The point of that event was to show a smooth-running gathering of the Republican party. It failed. The Trump campaign couldn't go a day without making a stupid mistake, and Ted Cruz threw a monkey wrench in the whole "unity" thing.
Even the FOP in philly has wrote to the DNC disgusted by the speakers choices.
http://www.pafop.org/docs/STMT FROM LODGE 5.pdf.
"
Even the FOP?"
You're making it sound like it's surprising that the police would be opposed anyone who doesn't kiss their asses.
In addition to this, DWS has now resigned as chairwoman of the DNC because of the email leak so I guess we won't be hearing from her. I have no idea how a Bernie supporter can suck it up and just accept the fact they got royally screwed over and never had a chance. There are emails attempting to attack Bernie for his jewish heritage and ruin his character and you think that if he somehow caught up they would have rallied behind him? Delusional.
Some idiot suggested it, but nobody else considered it. Hillary ran a far dirtier campaign against Obama than the DNC ever did against Bernie.
He lost because his campaign wasn't run well, something that the emails show. He didn't come close to beating the most unpopular Democratic candidate since Al Gore when anti-establishment sentiment is at an all time high. Saying that Bernie lost because the establishment was against him is like saying that if I get hit by a car, I'm going to miss work because the trains are late. Bernie was never going to win, with or without the DNC against him. The establishment was against Obama in 2008, and he still won because he ran a good campaign.
I liked Bernie and a lot of his ideas, but his campaign was a mess just like Hillary's 2008 campaign was a mess. You're being about as subtle in appealing to him as Trump was.
Emotional biased bs and not an argument worth any kind of response other than to say that it is not very tolerant to attack everyone that does not agree with you and continue to use divisive language like this. To completely disregard someone's perspective and call them an uncle-tom is sad and not fair to them.
Sad and not fair? You mean like the guy calling the majority of the people in a country rapists? The guy who said an American judge would be biased against him based on the judge's heritage? That guy?
Complaining about divisive language and supporting the guy who made divisive language the largest facet of his campaign is fairly hypocritical, wouldn't you say?
It pains me to see that you will still support an extremely careless, lying, corrupt piece of shit like Hillary Clinton and only proves to everyone that you're nothing more than a partisan individual with no desire to do anything other the perpetrate the left/right dichotomy by insulting those that do not fit your tumblr narrative. Donald Trump, more like Donald Drumph lol owned.
If someone being a careless, lying, corrupt piece of shit determines who you don't vote for, why are you supporting Trump? If you're going to insult a candidate, don't say they're the exact same things about them that your favored candidate is guilty of. It makes you look like a partisan hypocrite.
I like my careless, lying, corrupt pieces of shit who are running for President to have an understanding of how government works and to not run a blatantly racist campaign that is beloved by white supremacists who would be emboldened by said candidate's victory, but that's just me.
