Official BeyondUnreal Photography Thread

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

BillyBadAss

Strong Cock of The North
May 25, 1999
8,879
60
48
49
Tokyo, JP
flickr.com
How do you folks get such beautiful shots? I keep trying and trying and I'm lucky to get one shot that is sorta okay.

Edit:/ Here is my latest, although I am damned embarrassed to say that these were my best shots from yesterday's jaunt around the Strip. I tried saving it in jpg format but it was going to lose to much information in the compression.

[screenshot]http://www.acliffhanger.com/images/siren_bike.png[/screenshot]

Found one more that I sorta liked.

[screenshot]http://www.acliffhanger.com/images/DreamCar.jpg[/screenshot]

Don't worry about every shot being perfect. The trick is to keep shooting and maybe out of 36 shots you have one or two good shots. Usually they are never the shots that you think they would. (At least that's the way it is for me) Just keep shooting and applying what you learn.
 

OO7MIKE

Mr. Sexy
May 2, 2000
5,022
107
63
Nalicity, NC
Yes!

I've spoken with a lot of highly successful photographers in my area and its not uncommon only get a few keepers out of 100 shots (depends on the type of photography your doing). Your shooting to capture something and for some reason or another (usually for technical reasons) most shots are just ok. Nothing wrong with being picky and showing only your best.
 

OO7MIKE

Mr. Sexy
May 2, 2000
5,022
107
63
Nalicity, NC
I still havent gotten around to the HDR portrait yet. It was raining!

I was able to do a quick session with a fantastic model I've worked with in the past. She dyed her hair pink a week ago. I've never seen any really-well-done pink hair portraits before. I gave it a shot!

I threw in a few BW shots just for kicks. I have a new BW technique that I've been rocking lately. Clients seem to love the suedo pencil drawing effect it gives. It looks just like my old photo realistic pencil drawings I used to do. Probably why I'm so psyched about the technique.

1.
Elly_Pink_MG_1003.jpg


2.
Elly_Pink_MG_1113.jpg


3.
Elly_Pink_MG_1120.jpg


4.
Elly_Pink_MG_1106.jpg


5.
Elly_Pink_MG_1284.jpg


6.
Elly_Pink_MG_1342.jpg


BTW: I did this with 3 wirelessly triggered flashes, two umbrellas and 2 white sheets in her living room. Who needs a studio when you have creativity on your side?
 

Jacks:Revenge

╠╣E╚╚O
Jun 18, 2006
10,065
218
63
somewhere; sometime?

wow, those are outstanding. for being pretty simple shots, just knowing that they're authentic makes those fascinating to study.
and here I thought the world was actually just black and white prior to 1930 :eek:

edit - ok so that page has a link to the main collection of those color photos. if you have the time to browse any of it, try by keyword, there's some really beautiful, vintage sh*t. if you're into that.

click!
[screenshot]http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34500/1a34552v.jpg[/screenshot]
[screenshot]http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34800/1a34893v.jpg[/screenshot]
[screenshot]http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34200/1a34271v.jpg[/screenshot]
[screenshot]http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34200/1a34202v.jpg[/screenshot]
[screenshot]http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a34000/1a34400/1a34424v.jpg[/screenshot]
[screenshot]http://memory.loc.gov/service/pnp/fsac/1a35000/1a35100/1a35198v.jpg[/screenshot]

considering all of these are real it's pretty amazing I think.
massive collection here:
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsachtml/fsowhome.html
 

The_Head

JB Mapper
Jul 3, 2004
3,092
0
36
36
UK
www.unrealized-potential.com
Great shots Mike - I'd love to get a chance to work with a model
Like yours also WaitForTheRain - huge contrast with Mikes in style. I like :)


Snapshot through a window of the house yesterday in low light. Squirrel!!! xD
Wish it wasn't so dim, wouldn't have been able to lower the iso and get rid of some of that noise.
squirrel.jpg
 

OO7MIKE

Mr. Sexy
May 2, 2000
5,022
107
63
Nalicity, NC
Then go for it!!!
www.modelmeyhem.com is a great place to start. It removes the awkwardness of asking strangers. Very competitive on there. Best to find some newbie models to work with first and then work your way up.

ISO noise is part of the image! Use it. If processed correctly it can enhance the look and feel of an image.

Since Phopojijo has already broken the ice on custom edits of other peoples work:
__squirrel002.jpg
 

The_Head

JB Mapper
Jul 3, 2004
3,092
0
36
36
UK
www.unrealized-potential.com
Nice edit Mike. I can see you have played with the contrast which is something I really should have done more. (you should see the original, its really lacking - it was a fair increase just to produce my version!)
How did you get it to look so much sharper though?
 

SlipStreams_65

User Titles are Useless.
Dec 29, 2005
239
0
0
Kingdom of boredom
Some HDR shots I done recently:

[SCREENSHOT]http://i41.tinypic.com/10hn38k.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]

[SCREENSHOT]http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvlch3.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]

[SCREENSHOT]http://i39.tinypic.com/b507te.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]

Non HDR:

[SCREENSHOT]http://i41.tinypic.com/5l2iq8.jpg[/SCREENSHOT]
 

OO7MIKE

Mr. Sexy
May 2, 2000
5,022
107
63
Nalicity, NC
Nice edit Mike. I can see you have played with the contrast which is something I really should have done more. (you should see the original, its really lacking - it was a fair increase just to produce my version!)
How did you get it to look so much sharper though?

First of all I opened the image using raw converter in bridge. (yes you can do that!) I changed the images color temperature to a more pleasing hue. I knew the squirrels belly was more of a grey or a white than a blue. Then I opened it in photoshop.

I had noticed that your subject was a bit softer than the grass in front of it. To correct this I used a series of techniques to enhance the sharpness without introducing more noise. Using Genuine Fractiles I scaled the image up to 2000px high. I do this instead of using the standard PS resizing because it doesn't make the image blurry. It will however reveal detail you hadn't noticed before. (it doesn't create more detail though you may think so at first) I then used Noise ninja with custom settings, not to remove the noise but to enhance the image by use of a subtle contrast sharpening. (not the same as normal sharpening) The effect is very pleasing and it brings out the detail without enhancing the photo noise, jpg artifacts, or introducing halo effects on subject edges.

Just looking at the levels In PS I saw that the photo was underexposed a bit so I corrected it using a combination of "levels" and legacy contrast slider. I noticed your comments about contrast so I made it extra contrasty without loosing image detail. :)

The squirrel was still looking a little soft so I used the patch tool to select him. Adding a feather radius of 5px I was able to add additional sharpening without creating an obvious boarder. Feathering just makes the transition nice and smooth. I think I used smart sharpening settings of 70 and 2.0 "lens blur".

Finally I resized the image down to 600px high for web save. The image immediately appeared sharper and more pleasing. Much more so than if I had done all of these steps without upressing the image first with genuine fractals.

This was all done using my personal techniques and tastes. Its a lot of work and it really is a poor substitute for a in focus shot or a sharp lens. Thankfully the tools are available to help us enhance our images when things do not go according to plan. Squirrels are fast and hard to keep up with!
 

The_Head

JB Mapper
Jul 3, 2004
3,092
0
36
36
UK
www.unrealized-potential.com
Thanks for the nice in depth explanation Mike. Have an E-Cookie :D

I certainly can't blame the lens, it was shot with my 70-200 f/2.8! Sadly it was a massive crop - was the far end of the garden. I hope the squirrel being softer than the grass in front is a one off, I've read comments that the Sigma front focuses sometimes. I've yet to notice it in any other images, so I hope it was coincidence!