Not that I disagree with your sentiment necessarily, but that's spoken like somebody who doesn't have any idea what that entails.
Again you people with your baseless assumptions. I made a single broad statement.
I've been discussing for months now with my political science professors the problems surrounding our education system and the way the academic community is ignored in general. I think I have a pretty above average understanding of the matter.
The next huge blocks of text you wrote up for me, while cute and all, I already knew or agreed with.
teaching to a test, bad.
smaller classrooms, good.
assembly line teaching, bad.
foundational, building-block teaching, good.
putting more funds into an overloaded, understaffed system would be a good place to start for sure
No, no it wouldn't.
You cannot solve the problem by throwing money at it. We already outspend most of the modern world in education per-child yet we're still 21'st or worse in math and science.
Clearly, money is not the issue. We simply are not adequately preparing our youngsters with the skill sets in early primary education that will translate naturally into a well rounded secondary education. It's killing the country in so many more ways than the government seems to realize. Yet they never listen to the academia, education is always cut first when there's other problems.
sigh.