![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep. 3rd, 2001
Location: MONTANA, USA
Posts: 3
|
HELP!! My ping won't stay down low enough to play UT or any of the MODS. I have a 256K Wirless internet connection and it clocks regularly @ 245K download and 100K upload. I have tried adjusting the netspeed in the system console...nothing seems to bring the ping down. My system is a DP 450mhz G4 running OS9.1 with a ATI Rage128 w/16MB vram. CAN ANYONE HELP ME?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Being wireless, you may victim of poor latency:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Exactly what kind of wireless connection do you have? I doubt satellite considering you get 100k upload. What are your average pings to a UT server?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
There are plenty of upload Satellite connections now-days.
100kbit would be about right as well. If it IS satellite, you'll never get a low ping. If it's just to the local receiving tower - you got a chance. What kind of Ping ARE you getting?
__________________
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and success of liberty." John F. Kennedy My Rig(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep. 3rd, 2001
Location: MONTANA, USA
Posts: 3
|
My wireless account is not satelite. It goes only a bout a mile to a tower similar to a cellular phone tower. It runs off a 2+ GHZ signal. My PING in UT ranges from 145 which is great, all the way up to 4000. The sad thing is it used to always stay low...now I can't keep a low ping for nothing. I did some packet loss tests using DSL Reports and my ISP has a zero packet loss test every time. Any other questions fellas? (sorry if there are fems responding)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
They may have changed something..
try running tracert's to various places. Get uotrace - great for figuring where problems lie.
__________________
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and success of liberty." John F. Kennedy My Rig(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
hmm, im suspecting the technology is the same when 56k was first being "consumerized" that the connection is totally dependent on software. what connection is the modems interface? is it USB? check for conflicts with the USB port.
[edit] read post properly and saw Mac-like words.... good chance its USB and totally software controlled. when you have a software 56k modem, after 20 minutes of UT the sae happens what you described, thats when the modem is becoming too much for the CPU to keep it running. i think the same might be happening to your connection, but im not totally sure because wireless connections here (even tho designed for my area... thank you BT) are never gonna be deployed. [/edit] /me runs away from mac-like words!
__________________
I SellZ computers naow Still down, not out.. fighting the creek of life with no paddles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep. 3rd, 2001
Location: MONTANA, USA
Posts: 3
|
The interface that the connection uses is a CAT5 connection between me and the antenae. I have a gigabit card so there should be nothing lacking there...and the protocal for connection to the isp is simply a DCHP Server set-up through TCP/IP. I am starting to think that I just have crappy routings to the servers. Therefore crappy PINGS.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|