|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
POLL: What weapon should be included in Inf2.8??
For some obscure reason, most of you guys voted for the DE to be included in the 2.8 (I voted for the AKMSU, BTW).... However, the opinion of the majority seems to have changed so I thought we could have another poll. Please note: This is just for fun, heaven forbid that I´d suggest that the Inf-team should care too much about the results of this poll, much less change anything in 2.8...
[img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May. 25th, 2000
Posts: 30
|
None of the above!
How about a Ruger Super Redhawk in .454 Casull [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif[/img]
MP*Beretta If I am a hoe, then Inf is the gardening department of Home Depot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
DAMNIT! The FAMAS still isn't in there!
-Keiichi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov. 10th, 1999
Posts: 403
|
Well well well... lookey at who's winning... It's about time you guys got some sense blown into you. SIG 551 SWAT forever! w00t!
<hr color="#00FF00" size="1" align="left" width="50%"> <font face="Geneva,Verdana,sans-serif" size=-1 color="#FFFFFF">Jon Merriman (a.k.a. Disturbed) Infiltration Beta Tester</font> |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan. 27th, 2000
Posts: 126
|
Who fu*ked up the last voting
Who the hell voted for the DE last time anyway?
I know I didn't. RazoR [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] If it gibs, we can frag it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Don't look at me.
--- Another funky radical bombtrack started as a sketch in my notebook --- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb. 1st, 2000
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 341
|
I wonder if we could get a re-vote on the 2.8 weapon. This time, only registered forum goers can vote. That way, the typical mindless pre-teen crowds directed here by the unaviodable plantunreal blurb can be avoided.
How about it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Drifter
Join Date: Mar. 15th, 2000
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 1,893
|
afaik, there are still a couple of de lovers amongst us but i see they have disappeared...probably found out what a crappy gun it is after playing swat [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]...well as for myself, i voted for the sg 551... again...
It is impossible for the glass to be half full or half empty for you see: there is no glass |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec. 4th, 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 70
|
There is nothing more reassuring than looking down the sights of a Sig 551. Long live Sig. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img]
____________________ Snipa Day of Defeat Beta Tester ____________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Overtly Serious Chappy.
Join Date: Mar. 6th, 2000
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 393
|
Who voted for the DE last time?
Shamefully raises hand slowly without pride. My opinions have changed ALOT since then I can assure you. The reason so many people chose the DE was most likely the name, nothing more. <insert cute/ interesting/ bizarre signature here> |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Ya' know what? I honestly don't even remember WHAT I voted for. That's freaky. I HOPE it wasn't the Desert Eagle. If it was, I'll have to kick my own ass.
-Keiichi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I bet that if they had included a pic of the weapon when performing the poll, a LOT of people would have voted for the Sig... But to be honest, I voted for the AKMSU, I didn´t even know that the Sig was a rifle, I probably saw "Sig" and thought pistol, cuz the Swedish police use Sig Sauer pistols...
Great idea though, about a new poll, I´m certain the results would be different this time... I wonder what the inf team makes of all this though.. Warren? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb. 1st, 2000
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 341
|
I really don't think a re-vote is a bad idea. I don't see anyone talking about how the DE should stay in INF 2.8, its all SIG. Its like letting everyone in every nation except the USA elect the next US president.
If we could only get word to Warren... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Unfortunately, we've made our decision, and now we must deal with it. I personally did not vote for the Desert Eagle, however the majority did.
You've dug your own grave, prepare to lie in it. A revote would offset 2.8 by months. A new pistol would be a nice addition. And remember, a weapon's performance has nothing to do with "the way it looks". The snot gun in UT looks ugly, but in the right hands its a very powerful tool. The Robar, too, is an ugly-as-ass gun, but its a pretty much one-hit-one-kill weapon, even when contacting center-mass. Oh well. Live with it. --- Another funky radical bombtrack started as a sketch in my notebook --- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov. 10th, 1999
Posts: 403
|
It doesn't matter. The Desert Eagle is already in 2.8, so if the team did decide to revote they would just add in the Sig. There's no point in taking it out.
<hr color="#00FF00" size="1" align="left" width="50%"> <font face="Geneva,Verdana,sans-serif" size=-1 color="#FFFFFF">Jon Merriman (a.k.a. Disturbed) Infiltration Beta Tester</font> |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb. 1st, 2000
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 341
|
How would including the SIG add "months" to 2.8's release? The model is done, and I'm guessing the anims are already well under way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
lol! uhhh, guess again chief :P This stuff ain't exactly dustin' crops..
<hr align="left" width="50%" size="1" color="#00FF00"><font size="1">Warren Project Coordinator i n f i l t r a t i o n http://www.planetunreal.com/infiltration Questions? Are you a FNG? Check out our Roadmap Then check out our FAQ</font> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Overtly Serious Chappy.
Join Date: Mar. 6th, 2000
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 393
|
Can we get the sig in 2.85?
Or am i pushing my luck [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif[/img] <insert cute/ interesting/ bizarre signature here> |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|