![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
un armored vehicles/political debate
the whole thing with vehicles and armor is just a political move to shut up civilians and the media.
the soldier was practicly paid by the reporter to ask that question. that and they were reservists. last i checked, active duty takes precedence over reservists. ask any infantryman if they perfer vehicles with little/no armor, or vehicles that have max armor. 90% will say no/little armor. why? YOU CANT FSKING MOVE in the damned thing, that and you can hardly see since you have 6 inches of metal in the way. im sure rukee, and mike can attest to this. on the politics. everyone is corrupt, democrats are whiny bitches, republicans are on a power trip, and indepentands dont exsist cause the previous 2 and screaming so much no one hears the minority.
__________________
UP, UP, DOWN, DOWN, LEFT, RIGHT, LEFT, RIGHT, B, A, START. i am now uber |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
What the hell are you going on about?
__________________
Qualthwar: "Friends don't let friends map drunk." Homer: "Marge, Im pulling an all-nighter for my little girl. Put on a pot of coffee, drink it, and start making burgers." A quitter never wins, and dont trust whitey. Qualthwar.com-Best viewed in 1024X768, or perhaps not at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Aren't you a little late with that rant?
__________________
<Evil_Cope> no, its the pain of shame that is added to a "papercut". Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|