|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
21st Jan 2002, 04:14 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr. 28th, 2001
Posts: 11
|
server side attachment toggles...
well, understanding as we all do, that some items,(i.e. p90 silencer bug) don't work as advertised-AT FIRST, but can be fixed in subsequent patches, wouldn't it be wise to have a server side system to allow/disallow individual components to client loadouts?
this would allow a server admin to drop buggy parts from peeps loadouts without having to keep harping on each person who hasn't heard about "that bug" until the bug can be fixed... |
![DeAtH[hsma] is offline](styles/inf/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
|
|
|
21st Jan 2002, 09:58 PM
|
#2 |
|
White as Snow Moderator
Join Date: Jun. 19th, 2001
Location: PR's Barracks
Posts: 5,261
|
Um...I thought they fixed those in 2.87?
__________________
 --|| Sluggy Freelance || The Infiltration Forum Guidelines || Kegnet || Clan Phoenix Rising ||-- PsychoMoogieBagpuss: "...we are implementing an updated [forum] policy." ZenPirate: "I suggested that we not only ban [offenders], but also ban the forumer next to them." Arethusa: "So you're (at least largely) a diest?" NTKB: "No im a logical thinking christian" |
|
|
|
|
22nd Jan 2002, 12:03 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr. 28th, 2001
Posts: 11
|
well, of course, but bugs are not something that you plan for...
this option would allow server admins to block features that turn out to be bugged, until they CAN be patched... remember the lean? |
|
|
|
|
22nd Jan 2002, 12:32 PM
|
#4 |
|
Swinging the clue-by-four
Join Date: May. 21st, 2001
Location: USA, Maryland.
Posts: 5,781
|
I certainly do.
Would be nice to be able to disable certain weapons/attachments/combinations without having to make a (buggy)mutator that reclasses every damn one...
__________________
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
