iddQd said:
Whats your defenition of a boost jump? Mine is double jump, wall jump, double jump... letting you do a long ranged and high uber jump. It exsisted in UT2003 but not UT2004 since it was considered a bugg or exploit. But FMI has implanted it to UTXMP carelessly if UT2004 has it or not. Why cant this be the same? I mean, it's almost the same thing, an "exploit" exsisting in u2xmp but not in UT2004.
I wasn't sure what your definition is. None of the UT games have allowed you to do a DOUBLE jump->wall dodge->DOUBLE jump. They have allowed you to do SINGLe jump->wall dodge->single jump. This works in 2k3, 2k4, and U2 both, so I don't see what point you are trying to make. The only thing Epic did in 2k4 is tone down the HEIGHT of that jump. They considered it an unexpected feature, as CliffyB OFTEN SAID. I personally don't care if it's in XMP or not. As it stands, there is STILL a bug with it. And yes, I mean a BUG not an exploit.
It seemes to me that you don't even know what im talking about, install u2xmp try my description in the first post and compare to ut2004.
Um. Sorry, but I DO know what you're talking about. I know it's different in UTXMP than U2XMP. What you aren't understanding is that it is my opinion that it makes no difference. If U2XMP had never been written that way, you wouldn't be complaining now because you would be used to it that way. Thus that part of the movement DOES NOT MAKE XMP XMP.
Yes its still UTXMP in a more UT2004ish way, why bothering making UTXMP at all if we cant correct it after the original. Why are you against this at all, you like the drama? Im quite sure you never used it, if you would maybe you would find it usefull and unique compared to ut2004... please tell me why don't you think its important, right now I've only gotten the impression that you think its a bugg throughoutly and shouldn't be considered being brought back at all.
I don't care if it's brought back. What I care is that so many in the community are so vehement that UTXMP be IDENTICAL to U2XMP that they never consider whether a certain difference could be BENEFICIAL FOR THE GAMEPLAY. I never saaw a noob in U2XMP say "wow that guy is moving fast, he must be good" but I did see them say "wow that guy is moving fast he must be a cheater". It was independant of class and it gives new players the idea that it's pretty easy to cheat in the game if you can move that fast.
All I'm asking and all I've ever really asked is that people STOP WHINING and GIVE IT A CHANCE. But too many are "waah waah I can't move 10,000 mph like I could in U2XMP, so this game is busted! Fix now FMI or doom to UTXMP!!! waah waah"
Brizz ask any old u2xmp player about colors, they would probably think its a good feature. Ask anyone who's more into clangaming, they would say that its usefull to localise certain clanmmates for example to fast find and suport an artifact carrier.
Alot of people said the same thing about colors in UT2004. They are unnecessary. I am in a clan, I play in clan games all the time. My clanmates even use the UTcomp colors to complement their name. But I refuse to, and they don't give a crap. Some of my clan mates even stopped using the colors when they realized how stupid it is. There is no need. Can't you tell the difference between {Pee} and
{PEE}? Because I sure as freak can. My clan is different because of it's TAG not the stupid colors they use. I recognize who to help by who they are not because their name is gren and pink and mine is blue and red. The colored names argument is REALLY tired. The fact is that it is not necessary by any stretch of the word, and all arguments for it are the same ones that have been used since UT2004 came out.
Brizz how about the hud, the old one sucks right and the new one is elite? Imo the new one is just all info compressed into a bigg pile of numbers... man I cant keep check on anything, and Ive asked alot of other players too and they say the same thing.
Nope, never said that. I gave good reasons why the new HUD is superior to the old HUD, but I never said the old HUD absolutely sucks. It had lots of problems that I feel have been fixed pretty good. The new HUD with proper scaling and transparency will be just fine.
I think I can find more examples if I look hard enough.
I'm sure you can since you seem to feel fine twisting everything I say to make it fit what you are accusing me of. I could do the same to you but I don't have countless hours to waste searching the forums for something so useless.
It is as swiftpaladin sais, youve started a know it all foundation and you're holding too hard on it.
Most people consider anything said on a public forum material that is the posters OWN OPINON. I'm sure I could find several instance where you have said something on these forums and meant it as opinon where it sounded like you would think it was 100% fact. Therefore, judge anything I say pretty much as MY OPINON and not necessarily fact...thanks...
Still this is an forum and you have the right to think what ever you want and in the end it's all up to FMI, I hope they make the right decission(s).
I think they already have.
What a well thought out post... Hearing you talk I sometimes wonder if you ever play video games.
![[Shadow]Aksen](/data/avatars/s/41/41112.jpg?1424422862){kind=avatar}
