Cityintro.unr benchmarks here (updated)

[HSI]Indigo · Apr 26, 2001

Argh

Well heres mine for what its worth and yes I am about to upgrade next week in fact....

P3 450
128M Ram
velocity 4400 tnt card 16M
win 2K Pro
pci 64v sound (lol)

Med skins and world
Sound high
lighting and decals on

Min 21.52 Max 60.36 Av 34.9
in 800x600

low skins and world
sound low
lighting and decals on still though

min 25.54 max 60.40 av 41.06

my new system will be a t-bird 1.2G with 1028M Ram and a 64M prophet2 MX and sound live 5.1

I'll post them when I get the system

DaForZe · Apr 27, 2001

hmm update

hi everyone !

new update
system old:

PII 400
324MB kingston 133mhz
V3 3000 AGP
SB live platinum 5.1
40gb hdd
gigabyte bx board
+ some other **** in my pc =)

max. 80fps
min. 35fps
average. 55fps

new one :

athlon 1.33@1.66
1.5gb infineon@ 133
ATI Radeon 64
SBlive Platinum 5.1
120gb hdd
K7t board
+some other ****...

ill post the update of the frame rate in here...
ive to receive the new components first

so see u next week...

and keep the thread alive

yours ~~db~~

Qbic · Apr 27, 2001

P3 733EB
Asus CUV4X
Creative GeForce 2 GTS 32Mb
SB live
256Mb 133Mhz Ram
Windoze 98se

Everything on high/enabled. V-sync disabled:
1024x768x32
Low/avg/high: 23/51/103

Average and high are OK I guess, low has makes me a bit worried.

Volumetric lighting (fog) disabled:
1024x768x32
Low/avg/high: 35/56/105

The lowest framerate comes in the first subway tunnel with the fog, when I disable volumetric lighting the lowest framerate indrease dramatically. I'm quite frankly a little surprised that people with similar specs seem to get much better framerates with volumetric lighting enabled. Any suggestions?

SadaraK · Apr 27, 2001

Half of the people who post here dont include all the details THATS why they seem to have better frame rates than you (they never say what settings they have exactly) also dont forget having the right (not the most recent) drivers/dlls is essential.
Your frame rate is normal btw...
I have a 1 gig Athlon otherwise Im axactly the same as you and I run at about 10 to 12 fps faster which makes sense

Neziritch · Apr 29, 2001

hmmm...

Here we go...

Res: 1024 x 768
textures/skins high

P3 733mhz w/ 133 FSB and 256MB 133 ram
Voodoo 5 5500 w/ 64 meg
Says it uses glide for Unreal

Average from four maps tested:
Min:55.13
Max:145.98
Average:73.11

This seems really high, but its what the game says. At least I am not down to the 4 fps i was used to playing with when i ran DOOM on my old 486 with the smallest screen size possible

O0o--SmA--o0O · May 6, 2001

On my comp, whenever i enter a new level and (for example) run out a hallway, and turn to look at a large open area with a lot of detail, my comp freezes as it loade all the stuff into the cache for like 5 sec, then it goes at a constant 60 fps er so. This gets really annoying and I need to know how to fix this because i'm fighting the lag, and the people at teh same time and i almost always get fragged, then after i've been around that area enough and seen all the geometry, i can kick assorz. Can someone please tell me how to fix it! I have an 800 P3, Win 98, 128 sdram, and an Nvidia GeForce 2 Ultra (TOP OF THE LINE!), and i run ut in Open GL, cause d3d is way too slow. I update all my drivers for everything on my comp, all the time too.

Rooster · May 6, 2001

Let's leave this thread for benchmarks.

If you're having a problem - I suggest you make your own thread for it. Your problem will receive more attention that way.

But I suggest disabling precaching (or enabling it if you have it off).

§«OMéNz»§ · May 10, 2001

ummm....deathbrother.....just wondering wtf makes a 120GB HDD?? LMAO

Hatecrime69 · May 12, 2001

nothin to be proud of but...
min 6.10 max 43.85 avg 17.46
800*600*16 in metal rendering
max world texture medium body texture, detailed textures on
dolby on
..of course this is after playing a hour or two of doom legacy (doom in opengl running at 1024*768*32)

AMD K6-2 450
Fic Va-503+
Diamond S3 540 16mb agp
128mb ram (half edo)
Voodoo 1 4mb
win98se

Toolvana · May 13, 2001

Okay, my turn. I'm hoping someone will give me some helpful input to my situation.

PIII 750
Gigabyte GA-6VXE7+ VIA 693A chipset mb (latest bios)
256MB PC100
Voodoo3 3000 AGP
Diamond MX300 sound card
Win 98SE

All details maxed out.

CityIntro
1024x768x16 Glide
min. 23.92/max. 59.71/avg. 35.51

The next benchmark is using the same system except with a brand new Voodoo5 5500.

1024x768x16 Glide
min. 24.04/max. 59.72/avg. 35.79

Your probably thinking "wtf", well so was I. I know it's not a driver issue because I just reformated and installed the Voodoo5 fresh. I knew something was up when I saw people in this thread with a system comparable to mine getting double the framerate. It seemed as though my Voodoo5 was only using one of the VSA chips, so I went into the 3dfx tools thing and under the FSAA options I set it to use only one VSA chip thinking my framerate should pretty much drop in half had the card been using both VSA chips previously. Nope, I got the exact same framerate. I'm thinking I got a faulty card that only uses one VSA chip. I sent it back. Now I'm debating on what vid card I should buy. Should I try another Voodoo5 or buy a GeForce2 or 3 card? I can't decide...
Does anybody have any thoughts on this?

emerac · May 13, 2001

how?

how did u get UT to work under W2K with the Voodoo 3? which drivers did u use?

btw: I've never tried the intro, but an average offline botmatch with 16 bots gets me an usual 40 fps, and the lowest ever i've seen has been 20, I got 600 mhz with a voodoo 3, but that was on the good old days of win98, when UT worked with my vooodoo3, before my harddrive died

Rooster · May 14, 2001

UT runs just fine in Glide (V3 3000) with Windows 2000. Check the first post (mine).

Ferd · May 15, 2001

P3 500mhz 128mb

Voodoo 3 3000 agp. No v-sync
everything at max. (excepting LOD 1.2)
1024x768
42 fps average.

Rukee · May 16, 2001

I have two machines the first has a Gig MB, thunderbird 800@890, 128mb pc100 with a 64mb Rage maxx Furry card, full tilt every option on,
24.55 min.
106.82 max
57.47 avr
The other machine has a Tyon MB, thunderbird 900@950 with 358mb pc 133 ram with 64mb Elsa Gladiac Ultra card(Kickin!)same all options on.
64.89 min.
114.15 max
75.05 avr.
Both are at 1024x768 and 32 bit color.
Are these #s Okay??

Sapphire Nights · May 16, 2001

My computer is finally fixed so I have new benchys.

AMD 1200 CPU
Radean 64
512 PC-133 ram
Win 98SE
Asus A7V MB
SB X-Gamer sound card
IBM 30 meg ATA-100 hd (the part that was broken all along)
ViewSonic GS815 Graphics Series 21 inch monitor

Every sound and graphics option set to max.

1024x786 32 bit color

Low 49fps
Average 78fps
High 121fps

The numbers don't say it all. UT looked wonderfull with the ATI card. You have no idea how much so until you look at it. Also, I can run at a higher resolution with no problem. But then it's harder to hit anything because everyone is smaller.

JayX · May 16, 2001

Sapphire..

AMD 1200 CPU
Radean 64
512 PC-133 ram
Win 98SE
Asus A7V MB
SB X-Gamer sound card
IBM 30 meg ATA-100 hd (the part that was broken all along)
ViewSonic GS815 Graphics Series 21 inch monitor

Every sound and graphics option set to max.

1024x786 32 bit color

I have nearly the same system as you..

AMD "T-Bird" 1.2ghz
Radeon 64 vivo
256 Pc-133
AOpen AK73-Pro MB
WD 40 gig ATA-100 HD
Windows 98se
Using Direct X 8a

and I get Avg 69 on the flyby with 1024x768x32 everything maxed.. What do you use D3D or what? Can you post what you have in ur UT.ini for whatever you use..thank you..

Sapphire Nights · May 17, 2001

My ut.ini is what ever UT installed it as. I have not changed it manually. I am using D3D. My avg. frames where lower before because my HD was defective and it was affecting the system.

Xnife · May 17, 2001

This is the longest, most pointless thread i've ever seen...

JayX · May 17, 2001

ok thank Sapphire..

This is the longest, most pointless thread i've ever seen...

Yes it is one of the longest but not pointless...it is one of the most helpful threads also... its for people to compare their fps to other people who have similar system specs. and to see if what their fps should or could be. Maybe you dont comprehend anything that has been said here so you just bash it. =\

You-Suk|BuF · May 22, 2001

specs.

cel2 566@850
512 mb 133 mhz
Matrox G400
wd 9.1 (7200 rpm)
Ibm 40 (7200 rpm)
17" Liyama

1024-768 (every set to minimum

)

high 61
low 34
aver. 50

next week another update, i'm gettin' a
Geforce II pro 64 Mb

can't wait

Cityintro.unr benchmarks here (updated)

Tail Chaser

New Member

The horrors...

Groving in UT since 1999

Mmm...Gas-powered cheese slicer...

pfft

Local Legend

p§ýCh0p@th

Novice

RL hostage

New Member

Local Legend

«]§ß[»

Coffee overclocks the overclocker!!

BANNED

Lag Master..

BANNED

I $t@b y0u b!tch!

Lag Master..

Getting ready