Personally I'd prefer it if you did it the other way, keep the supersonic ammo and modify the sounds. Again, another feature planned for IWE2.
[Mutator]INF Ballistic Tweak
- Thread starter Conglomera
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
Crowze said:
So you think I should keep the supersonic ammo, that's a possibility, because frankly I've found no ballistic data about .223 subsonic ammunitions, just bullets for sale, with no data sheet... so all the values I used for sub 5.56 are theorical. And I'm not sure about the realism of the RoundsPerMin values I parsed for supressed 5.56 rifles, as I have no clue of the cicling rate such cartridges should produce. I would like to hear more opinions on this subject.
Besides, If I revert back to supersonic bullets this means that all weapons (including submachine gun) will be using their supersonic ammo, even P-90.
And hey... why don't you release the IWE2 source so I can see what could be used for IBT?
Edit : Oh! This is my 100th post! The 100th in 4 years... This must be celebrated
Last edited:
G36 in D3d
The shot bellow shows the G36K in its buggiest position in d3d mode, after I modified the aim view point... Should I go further? or should I come closer to the original value because it's not yet at the limit of acceptance/ban? More simply just tell me how the worst it can look to be accepted on servers... cuz comming closer to original value is more realistic.
The shot bellow shows the G36K in its buggiest position in d3d mode, after I modified the aim view point... Should I go further? or should I come closer to the original value because it's not yet at the limit of acceptance/ban? More simply just tell me how the worst it can look to be accepted on servers... cuz comming closer to original value is more realistic.
Attachments
conglomera, im not sure about implementing the 5.56 supressed modifications.. because we are not 100% sure.
maybe leave it like that for the moment?
crowse, i thought you abandonned iwe?
ok heres whats going on
screen 1 is what i did for this mutie (i test ) for the m4a1 and m16a4 carrying handle. it will be in final version if conglo is ok. the sight is closer and helps long range shoots and is more realistic. i did similar for m16a2
screen 2 is puting the eod sight further, because personnaly i think it currently blocks the screen a little too... what do you think? this option is just a suggestion.
for the g36 he found out a final value . its still very close to the screen and realistic, but at the same time it makes the weapon unbuggy, and efficient in the right hands.
its amazing how a small change makes the weapon really beter. he didnt put the weapon far, its similar to the screen in conglo post above.
as for blackak, only coding is left and im beggin conglo to try it
coz i really suck.
maybe leave it like that for the moment?
crowse, i thought you abandonned iwe?
ok heres whats going on
screen 1 is what i did for this mutie (i test ) for the m4a1 and m16a4 carrying handle. it will be in final version if conglo is ok. the sight is closer and helps long range shoots and is more realistic. i did similar for m16a2
screen 2 is puting the eod sight further, because personnaly i think it currently blocks the screen a little too... what do you think? this option is just a suggestion.
for the g36 he found out a final value . its still very close to the screen and realistic, but at the same time it makes the weapon unbuggy, and efficient in the right hands.
its amazing how a small change makes the weapon really beter. he didnt put the weapon far, its similar to the screen in conglo post above.
as for blackak, only coding is left and im beggin conglo to try it
coz i really suck.
Last edited:
![Corporal_Lib [BR]](/data/avatars/s/45/45790.jpg?1424422878){kind=avatar}
Corporal_Lib [BR]
Brazilian Graphic Designer & Gun Nut {=)
Groovy!!! Hope this new version will be released soon!!!
Conglomera, I´be be hosting a Noob training server using your IBT, along with Magcheck, RT, and other "fun" mutties that doesn´t compromise the conection... [=D
[from 10 PM zulu (-4 GMT/Sao Paulo, New york time zone) to 2 AM]
Conglomera, I´be be hosting a Noob training server using your IBT, along with Magcheck, RT, and other "fun" mutties that doesn´t compromise the conection... [=D
[from 10 PM zulu (-4 GMT/Sao Paulo, New york time zone) to 2 AM]
I like those. They look better/easier to use. It is too bad the carry handle model is a bit off and the front sight is so tiny and grey.Vega-don said:
Also too bad that that Bush's 'MP5A2' has a flattop rail....
I hope those changes get added to IWE or something.
na; not iwe , this conglomera mutator will enhance iwe, taking the good parts of iwe and adding things.
these needs to get approved by conglo and d3d tested, then added..
m16a2
m16a4
g36 (look the free aim)
m16a2
m16a4
g36 (look the free aim)
So, those don't clip at all? How close to the eye can you get them before they start to clip with the camera?
Moving the G3A3, AKM, and the MP5A2 w/diopter closer would be nice too.
Moving the G3A3, AKM, and the MP5A2 w/diopter closer would be nice too.
I think bushes mp5a4 with the irons need to come a bit closer, to make the sights look bigger. I think its just me, but its really challenging to aim through them.
they dont clip. maybe i could go closer but it looks nice no now?
g3 bugs. fal bugs. mp5 /EOG sight havent tried to put it closer. akm havent tried.
mp5a4 clips when closer. as long as the screen "cuts" the model it clips
g3 bugs. fal bugs. mp5 /EOG sight havent tried to put it closer. akm havent tried.
mp5a4 clips when closer. as long as the screen "cuts" the model it clips
Last edited:
No, not the EOtech Sight, just the diopter sight closer.Vega-don said:
Oh, and in INF it is called the MP5A2 not the MP5A4. Even though the A2 shouldn't have a burst fire mode
Corporal_Lib [BR]
Brazilian Graphic Designer & Gun Nut {=)
UN17 said:
I´m training some (2 at least)... and there were some other guys that had a server on their own, weeks ago... they knew a lot about INF but weren´t as skilled as you guys...
At least I´m sweeting my but to come with more players to INF... I even use my community at orkut to "convert" FPS gamers to play inf, there a lot of "sheeps" to be sheppared down there..{;-)