Mark Rein "Excited for Unreal Tournament Comeback"

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
Sir_Brizz

Sir_Brizz

Administrator
Staff member
Feb 3, 2000
26,020
83
48
GreatEmerald said:
GOG.com and its users are strictly DRM-free, and they're not that minor. Epic would be doing a mistake to lose that part of the market. I could see them doing two versions, Steam and DRM-free, though. UE4 probably makes it fairly easy to do that.
Click to expand...
Maybe not, but I also guarantee you that many of the people who own games on GOG also own them on Steam, and GOG doesn't do anything to solve mod discoverability, which UTX needs to solve if it is going to succeed.
sneh said:
More likely I think they will have some kind of in-game (or pre-game launcher) marketplace just like the engine itself does. In fact, probably just part of the existing marketplace in it's own UT section as such.
Click to expand...
I really don't think they will do this. The file space hosting requirements would be astronomical. Right now, they decide what goes on the engine launcher. I would be surprised if it is set up to handle the absolute volume of content that UT games have, especially if the maps are anywhere near as large as UT3 maps. Valve already operates with that expectation and have a system designed for it.

That being said, I would be satisfied if they had their own system. It just seems silly to reinvent the wheel here. And their launcher has none of the other nice features that Steam has.
AlteredForms said:
The discussion about Steam has made me put my own opinion in about the platform. I like Valve and Steam as a whole, but I don't have this Godly and omnipotent view of them, as most people do. They filled a market which would have been filled anyway if developers got off their backsides and implemented online distrubtion. Some experimented with it and thought it better to not tamper with a simple formula.
Click to expand...
That is true, except if they hadn't filled it, we would have Digital River, and SecuROM and TAGES filling the market. I'm not a true fan of DRM, but Steam adds significantly more than (what someone else called) "a bit of convenience". There is simply not a more convenient platform with as many additional customer-focused features for getting and playing games available today anywhere else.
 
hal

hal

Dictator
Staff member
Nov 24, 1998
21,409
19
38
54
------->
www.beyondunreal.com
WGH said:
Speaking of UT3 Hellbender, it became essentially a "single-player" vehicle. Since rear turret charges itself without being manned, and it's nigh impossible to aim at speed, there's no point of having dedicated player manning the turret. It's hard to synchronize actions of driver and gunner, and it's just simpler and more effective just to let driver rapidly switch to gunner, fire, and then switch back, usually in less than one second.
Click to expand...

My favorite memories of the Hellbender include finding a little hole to park in, while the driver covers foot traffic with skymines and the turret takes out those other annoying vehicles.

You're right though, trying to shoot anything from the turret while the vehicle is in motion is nearly pointless.

I have mixed feelings about the vehicles, in general. I had fun playing with them, but it was painfully obvious how much it needed to be its own game. They tried correcting the player mobility with the hoverboards (which didn't do much imo), but the weapons were still horribly unbalanced with the vehicles.
 
N1ghtmare

N1ghtmare

Sweet Dreams
Jul 17, 2005
2,411
12
38
Where least expected
Because when valve implodes everything will just go *poof*. Nobody will try and buy up the assets. Nobody will create alternate platforms. Other game companies won't mind when a majority of their players instantly vanish.
 
AlteredForms

AlteredForms

Registered User
Apr 9, 2014
157
6
18
United Kingdom
Sir_Brizz said:
That is true, except if they hadn't filled it, we would have Digital River, and SecuROM and TAGES filling the market. I'm not a true fan of DRM, but Steam adds significantly more than (what someone else called) "a bit of convenience". There is simply not a more convenient platform with as many additional customer-focused features for getting and playing games available today anywhere else.
Click to expand...

Steam has been around for over a decade. It would be surprising if it didn't dominate the digital distrubtion after all the time, money and effort that has been pooled into it. If it hadn't got around to it first, then Direct2Drive would be taking the premier spot and IGN would be making more money than ever.

The fact of the matter lies in how convenient Steam is, but not how revelatory the platform as a whole is percieved to be.
 
Sir_Brizz

Sir_Brizz

Administrator
Staff member
Feb 3, 2000
26,020
83
48
ambershee said:
The number of games orientated companies that have lasted for thirty years can be counted on the fingers of your hands.
Click to expand...
You can say the same thing about computer oriented companies. Move that dial ahead ten years and it gets much larger, and again ten more years and it gets even more large. Steam brings in a huge amount of revenue, is integrated with dozens (if not hundreds) of companies products, and is used by over 30 million people. It's not likely to disappear.
AlteredForms said:
Steam has been around for over a decade. It would be surprising if it didn't dominate the digital distrubtion after all the time, money and effort that has been pooled into it. If it hadn't got around to it first, then Direct2Drive would be taking the premier spot and IGN would be making more money than ever.

The fact of the matter lies in how convenient Steam is, but not how revelatory the platform as a whole is percieved to be.
Click to expand...
Direct2Drive existed before Steam, as did DigitalRiver. Both absolutely horrendous solutions that would have led to exorbitantly invasive DRM becoming the norm. The only reason that ridiculous DRM schemes have mostly disappeared (including limited machine activations) is because of Steam. If Steam wasn't around, those would be common and probably the majority of PC games would be sold with them. I think it's a pretty big deal that Steam came about and dominated the market in the face of that potential future.

Considering the direction the industry was going as recently as 2008, I don't think it's wrong to be pretty grateful that Steam exists.
 
Raynor.Z

Raynor.Z

Ad Nocendum Potentes Sumus
Feb 1, 2006
1,491
7
38
I'm probably one of those individuals who will avoid Steam where possible.
While it's the convenient way to buy games digitally and has mostly transparent DRM, it's still DRM. Anything that has online (even initial) requirement to work is a big negative for me. It's also a matter of ownership versus rental.

That's why I'm hoping if Epic announces new UT title (in whatever form), it's not exclusively tied to Steam or similar platform.
 
W

Wail of Suicide

Member
Apr 11, 2006
738
0
16
Sir_Brizz said:
I agree with this, but this game is going to be made by content discoverability. They HAVE TO integrate Steam Workshop or something very similar (why reinvent the wheel here?) this time. Custom content is the coup de grace of the Unreal Engine and Unreal Tournament. It had better be the focus of this game.

On the other hand, letting it be too "open" could have its own drawbacks.
Click to expand...

Agreed with this. Way back in 2005-6 era I was suggesting that UT3 should have some kind of built in mod search and P2P (torrent) client functionality to search, install, and distribute mods.

Steam Workshop is essentially everything I envisioned on that front and it's amazing. It's too bad that Epic was not forward thinking enough at the time to incorporate something like that with UT3. But I think Steam Workshop has showed a lot of people that modding games isn't just a fringe benefit but a core feature to many games. It always has been with past UT titles, and for Portal 2, Skyrim, and others it's there now.

About 12 hours to go.
 
ambershee

ambershee

Nimbusfish Rawks
Apr 18, 2006
4,519
7
38
37
Nomad
sheelabs.gamemod.net
Indeed - I couldn't envision a future UT without Steam Workshop, or at least a direct equivalent.

Trouble is, you know that Epic is going to require you to subscribe to UE4 to mod their new games.... :/
 
W

WGH

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
237
0
0
31
Moscow, Russia
wgh.ath.cx
ambershee said:
Trouble is, you know that Epic is going to require you to subscribe to UE4 to mod their new games.... :/
Click to expand...
If that were true, modding would be almost dead (except extreme enthusiasts). Because I doubt many people would pay additional money for the sake of game that's not theirs (and with no profit).
Besides, what's the problem with giving the mod tools? Epic can't fear of engine being "stolen" that way, because it already is. Rights to use the engine are enforced mostly legally, not technically, anyway.
 
ambershee

ambershee

Nimbusfish Rawks
Apr 18, 2006
4,519
7
38
37
Nomad
sheelabs.gamemod.net
This was my argument - but that is what they intend to do. UE4 games are also not allowed to ship any part of the editor with the product.

My own game intends to ship at $10-15. I don't think people will be happy to pay an extra $19 just to get mod support :/
 
G

GreatEmerald

Khnumhotep
Jan 20, 2008
4,042
1
0
Lithuania
ambershee said:
I've pointed this out. You can get older versions and branches, however it means you have to recompile the source code yourself before you get a working editor.
Click to expand...

Huh? I still don't quite get it... Does UE4 include all branches from all games? And what doesn't it include? Assets? Else you'd have no reason to buy UT4, you could just buy UE4 and compile it.

Also, if every game has their own branch, then this is very scary in terms of updates. I'd be fine with $20 for getting access to modding tools; I would not be fine with having to shell out $20 after every patch.
 
ambershee

ambershee

Nimbusfish Rawks
Apr 18, 2006
4,519
7
38
37
Nomad
sheelabs.gamemod.net
WGH said:
So basically it's just a rumour.
Click to expand...

No. It's what he actually said. I dug this out of a chatlog:

One of the things that excites us greatly is the prospect of UE4 developers creating moddable games

The intended workflow is that mod makers would obtain UE4 access by subscribing here, getting access to the mainline Epic version of the code and tools. You'd then expose your version of the tools (if they differ from mainline) and the C++ source code (if you choose to share it) with the community via a GitHub fork which is open to current UE4 subscribers you choose to give access.

This workflow works right now and is supported by the EULA. Over time hopefully we can find a more polished approach to redistributing the tools.

The benefit of keeping mods in the UE4 community is the Marketplace providing a way for everyone (indies, mod makers, and even triple-A) teams having access to a stream of new content, and a straightforward means of sharing some/all game code in GitHub via fork.
Click to expand...

Edit: Original source:
https://forums.unrealengine.com/sho...ean-that-games-cant-be-moddable&p=706#post706
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom