Good luck Ms. Palin.
- Thread starter Luv_Studd
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
- Status
[PSI]Snow White;2194523 said:
You must be deaf, dumb and blind.
Palin didn't answer a question. In fact, she went out of her way to avoid them and let the moderator know that she wouldn't be answering them head on.
If you consider just getting by (regurgitating heavily memorized, finite information and talking points) a success, then I guess she was successful.
Where I come from, doing the bare minimum does not mean you won.
![[PSI]Snow White](/data/avatars/s/54/54072.jpg?1424422902){kind=avatar}
Speaking of the moderator, I wonder how Gwen Ifill's pre-order PRO Obama book sales are doing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cKAFqn4Y8Q
RE: Gwen Ifill's book
To be fair, I don't think we know that the book is PRO Obama. It seems to be a study of the progress of black politicians and she's said she hasn't yet written the chapter on Sen. Obama. It is kind of weird that it is supposedly coming out on inauguration day though and I'm certain that she's at least outlined the chapter given that the book has his name in the very title.
I have to say though that it's probably something that one attempting to assume a neutral role would want to reveal to the debate commission. I'm pretty sure they could cough up a moderator that wasn't writing a book about either one of them.
In the end though, it was probably a non-factor.
To be fair, I don't think we know that the book is PRO Obama. It seems to be a study of the progress of black politicians and she's said she hasn't yet written the chapter on Sen. Obama. It is kind of weird that it is supposedly coming out on inauguration day though and I'm certain that she's at least outlined the chapter given that the book has his name in the very title.
I have to say though that it's probably something that one attempting to assume a neutral role would want to reveal to the debate commission. I'm pretty sure they could cough up a moderator that wasn't writing a book about either one of them.
In the end though, it was probably a non-factor.
Read it, have you?[PSI]Snow White;2194864 said:Speaking of the moderator, I wonder how Gwen Ifill's pre-order PRO Obama book sales are doing?
Anyway, sod the book, she was a terrible moderator.
Read it, have you?
Anyway, sod the book, she was a terrible moderator.
No. Why should I read about The One? He's noting get my vote.
Well, if the book were actually out, you might read it so that when you throw accusations about bias about, you don't look like you're making things up without any evidence for it.[PSI]Snow White;2194902 said:No. Why should I read about The One? He's noting get my vote.
I agree that the moderator was a non-factor. The questions were fair, and she stuck to the format. The new format keep the conversation more directed, but it wasn't as interesting. It also added a strange element of strategy that Biden exploited well. If the time for that subject was running out he could say whatever he wanted and Palin couldn't respond. For instance when Biden mentioned that McCain wouldn't talk to the president of Spain. That's the second time that this claim has gone unchallenged in the debates.
Lizard Of Oz
Demented Avenger
Imagine that McCain and Palin win the election and, Jeebus forbid, McCain dies. And then Russia decides it wants to invade some non-NATO, eastern European nation. And we have a debate/negotiation with one of Putin's puppets....
Putin's Puppet: If we leave Genericistan will you remove your missiles from East Genericistan?
Palin: Gosh darn it, you betcha I'm not going to answer your questions there. Let me tell you about my energy experience....
The person who should have "dominate the direction of the debate" was the moderator, and she should not have tolerated any deviation from the question at hand.
Last edited:
[PSI]Snow White;2194635 said:
I am sorry but you are a complete moron. You're the type of person who probably didn't vote for George Bush because, "He looks like a chimp omg lol!" or maybe you didn't vote for Kerry because, "He looks like a horse rofl!"
But I'm sure now that we have a superficial bitch who can reflect (according to your values) how all women should look, act, and think - hey, why not have free breast implants and liposuctions for all? Since that's what REALLY matters.
I can tell you've probably had your fill. Try not to purge yourself on the way out.
I watched most of the debate because I didn't have anything better to do. It was somewhat entertaining, actually. Points:
1. People that say "dog-gone it" scare me.
2. The most annoying thing in the whole debate was Palin desperately trying to call McCain a "Maverick" whenever mentioning him. Sheesh.
3. I really hope no one in America actually cares about the candidates' personal lives.
1. People that say "dog-gone it" scare me.
2. The most annoying thing in the whole debate was Palin desperately trying to call McCain a "Maverick" whenever mentioning him. Sheesh.
3. I really hope no one in America actually cares about the candidates' personal lives.
- Status