Half Nekked people
- Thread starter flo0tz
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
You are oversensitive, imo. If there head is exposed, there is nothing unrealistic or straying from the theme about a little bit more neck being exposed.Persefone said:
This is a computer game called UnrealTournament2007(maybe). People dress with that much cleavage showing on regular occassions, even work.I don't think it's healthy being that sensitive to things like this. There shouldn't be anything prude about a video game where you gib your opponents in a spectator arena gladiator sport. Even FCC is less nonsensical than that.
Come on peeps, some of you make it sound like you want ALL sex apeal taken out, whether male or female. It's a poduction, and like any producer knows, sex sells. I mean we mine as well take out the weapons while we are at it, because who wants to see blood and guts too, right? 
briachiae said:
For the sake of..... realism?
You're a funny little man, aren't you?
Make the UT girls wear burkas from now on. BUT, their boobs ought to be showing because it's no big deal. It's all about dominance.
Persefone said:
*eh* considering your avatar I'd say that you shouldn't be complaining about any cleavage at all.
Besides : they're merely concepts. Even Malcolms' armour doesn't look quite like that. So it is safe to say a slightly more sane version of the female variant will be used.
They're a hell of a lot better than the current female mercs & soldiers
Prepare for an education.
I don't think anyone would argue in favour of sticking a bunch of butt-ugly characters (male or female) into the game is a good thing. But the selkath style stuff is just pandering to stereotypes that we should really have grown out of by now. Let it go people.
This thread (and subject) badly needs some female input...
I don't think anyone would argue in favour of sticking a bunch of butt-ugly characters (male or female) into the game is a good thing. But the selkath style stuff is just pandering to stereotypes that we should really have grown out of by now. Let it go people.
This thread (and subject) badly needs some female input...
I was spitting out different ideas and points. None of them where meant to complement eachother directly.NeoNite said:
The only reason I was talking about realism is because that is what I was to led to believe the new theme was going to be about. Less cartoonish characters and such. But then I read JaFO's post and that put things into perspective. This is not going to be super realistic or super militaristic(not fun). It's going to be a gladiator sport with the sole purpose for entertaining spectators or the players even.
Last edited:
Hmmm... plausible reasons to go for less of the sexy:
1. Scantily- clad chicks are unrealistic. Well... so what?
2. Scantily- clad chicks help perpetuate the scantily- clad chick stereotype. Could be. But it's a videogame, it's a walking, talking stereotype anyway. Everything associated with it is a stereotype in one way or another. Wouldn't it be hilarious if all the models in UT looked like middleaged office workers?
3. Scantily- clad chicks scare off female players. Well, somehow I doubt a Victorian dress code is going to encourage girls/ women to play a violent FPS... or a videogame of any sort for that matter. Most girls I know think it's a nerd's pursuit one way or the other.
4. Scantily- clad chicks will make girlfriends/ wives/ prospects think you're a lecko. Hmmm. Quite a number of girls I've talked to on the subject tend to be a tad suspicious if a guy doesn't have a certain amount of pr0n stashed somewhere. Too much is bad... none is worse. But maybe I've got bad taste in women.
5. Scantily- clad chicks are somehow irritating to you. Well hey, that's your right.
6. Scantily- clad chicks are something you try to keep your 6 year old sibling and/ or parent(s) from running into. That's probably sensible.
7. Scantily- clad chicks help give video games a bad rap. Sadly, that's probably true.
8. Scantily- clad chicks are a Bad Thing(tm) because sex is eViL. Whoa, podnah... that's a huge part of the problem with modern society IMO. That's debatable, though.
9. Scantily- clad chicks don't belong in a violent FPS because associating sex with violence is just a bad way to go. If that's your beef, then you've really thought this through. GJ :tup:. 100 bonus points, -1 for not giving your fellow gamer enough credit.
10. Scantily- clad chicks in a videogame are pointless because they're just a bunch of rendered polygons and are such a poor substitute for the real deal as to not merit a jot of attention. This is singularly true... but not really an argument against them.
11. Scantily- clad chicks are Bad because they suggest immorality, and God's not particularly keen on that. That's fine with me. But what about all the cursing and wanton homicide?
*edited per Kingman3* 12. Scantily- clad chicks just don't look tough enough to hang with the Tournament. Hmmm... could be.
So. Which one (or ones) of those are you guys advocating?
1. Scantily- clad chicks are unrealistic. Well... so what?
2. Scantily- clad chicks help perpetuate the scantily- clad chick stereotype. Could be. But it's a videogame, it's a walking, talking stereotype anyway. Everything associated with it is a stereotype in one way or another. Wouldn't it be hilarious if all the models in UT looked like middleaged office workers?
3. Scantily- clad chicks scare off female players. Well, somehow I doubt a Victorian dress code is going to encourage girls/ women to play a violent FPS... or a videogame of any sort for that matter. Most girls I know think it's a nerd's pursuit one way or the other.
4. Scantily- clad chicks will make girlfriends/ wives/ prospects think you're a lecko. Hmmm. Quite a number of girls I've talked to on the subject tend to be a tad suspicious if a guy doesn't have a certain amount of pr0n stashed somewhere. Too much is bad... none is worse. But maybe I've got bad taste in women.
5. Scantily- clad chicks are somehow irritating to you. Well hey, that's your right.
6. Scantily- clad chicks are something you try to keep your 6 year old sibling and/ or parent(s) from running into. That's probably sensible.
7. Scantily- clad chicks help give video games a bad rap. Sadly, that's probably true.
8. Scantily- clad chicks are a Bad Thing(tm) because sex is eViL. Whoa, podnah... that's a huge part of the problem with modern society IMO. That's debatable, though.
9. Scantily- clad chicks don't belong in a violent FPS because associating sex with violence is just a bad way to go. If that's your beef, then you've really thought this through. GJ :tup:. 100 bonus points, -1 for not giving your fellow gamer enough credit.
10. Scantily- clad chicks in a videogame are pointless because they're just a bunch of rendered polygons and are such a poor substitute for the real deal as to not merit a jot of attention. This is singularly true... but not really an argument against them.
11. Scantily- clad chicks are Bad because they suggest immorality, and God's not particularly keen on that. That's fine with me. But what about all the cursing and wanton homicide?
*edited per Kingman3* 12. Scantily- clad chicks just don't look tough enough to hang with the Tournament. Hmmm... could be.
So. Which one (or ones) of those are you guys advocating?
Last edited:
I wouldn't mind a "cheesecake girl" myself, but there's gotta be some balance here for chrissakes. Some skin (legs, T&A) is good, but the girl still needs some beefy armor (shoulders, arms, lower legs, etc.), a bit of muscle tone, and that edge of badass; kinda like Julie Strain (F.A.K.K.).
KEEP THE SKIN!!!
Females have skin showing for one reason
"Dangerous and Secksi looks"
And not I'm not a freak thinking computer created females should be half nekked , it's just normal for ut and it would lose that "UT factor" in the ladies if they aren't
Females have skin showing for one reason
"Dangerous and Secksi looks"
And not I'm not a freak thinking computer created females should be half nekked , it's just normal for ut and it would lose that "UT factor" in the ladies if they aren't
Last edited:
Where's the tight-butted Orlando Bloom beefcakes? You guys at least have some *mildly* attractive ButterHeads, I demand equally gratuitous hotties! :tup:
:tup:
they need at least one guy with a metal thong, and titanium nipple cups.
nothing else.
________
FullMoonSexy live
nothing else.
________
FullMoonSexy live
Last edited:
OMG LOOK AT THOSE PENIS ARMOR FLAPS THEIR PENISES MUST BE HUGE!!!11
HUMONGOUS EVEN!!! AND THEIRS BICEOPSS :0 :0 SEXAH MAN!!
http://www.beyondunreal.com/staff/raptor/ut2007_may05/hr/up4.jpg
HUMONGOUS EVEN!!! AND THEIRS BICEOPSS :0 :0 SEXAH MAN!!
http://www.beyondunreal.com/staff/raptor/ut2007_may05/hr/up4.jpg
Angel_Mapper said:Where's the tight-butted Orlando Bloom beefcakes? You guys at least have some *mildly* attractive ButterHeads, I demand equally gratuitous hotties!
Well hey, you've got the skillz... go ahead, whup us up a tarzan dude.
:tup:*edit*
Is it just me, or does that guy on the far right kinda look like Dick Nixon?
Last edited:
My squirrel girl looks like a bear cub, I do *NOT* have the skills to make a hottie character model.
Angel_Mapper said:My squirrel girl looks like a bear cub, I do *NOT* have the skills to make a hottie character model.
Oh.
Well hell, you're known and stuff... bullyrag somebody else into making it for you.
I agree with Angel_Mapper, for every selket-like female there should be an equally attractive male. Now the biggest problems are:
A) The UT team needs to be less sexist in this respect.
B) The UT team need to hire women or gays to tell them if a male character is attractive or not.
There is no chance that UT2007 won't have sexual content, it would be fair to have sexual content for the opposite sex included though. ( PS no sex-bots, why would a robot have a gender or any amount of cleavage [its not attractive and not sexual in any way])
A) The UT team needs to be less sexist in this respect.
B) The UT team need to hire women or gays to tell them if a male character is attractive or not.
There is no chance that UT2007 won't have sexual content, it would be fair to have sexual content for the opposite sex included though. ( PS no sex-bots, why would a robot have a gender or any amount of cleavage [its not attractive and not sexual in any way])
It's harder to make an attractive male model, because women are harder to satisfy. The female models actually aren't more attractive than the male models in terms of details and etc. They just have boobs, a butt and a slim figure. Male models have a visible chest and biceps and ass. They aren't attractive.
Girls wear dresses guys wear suits. Women in the modern western pop society don't cover up as much as men. Women showing more skin is not sexist. Is it a stereotype? yes. Just as men not showing off their navel is a stereotype.
I could argue UC2 selket was just as sexy as the osiris or whatever his name is. Women are more picky too. I think people posting in this thread are posting just for the humor of it, and not actually concerned about women having larger than average natural breastsize in a computer game.
Girls wear dresses guys wear suits. Women in the modern western pop society don't cover up as much as men. Women showing more skin is not sexist. Is it a stereotype? yes. Just as men not showing off their navel is a stereotype.
I could argue UC2 selket was just as sexy as the osiris or whatever his name is. Women are more picky too. I think people posting in this thread are posting just for the humor of it, and not actually concerned about women having larger than average natural breastsize in a computer game.
Whats wrong with the middle guy in that concept picture? He looks like Vin Diesel How can girls not drool over Vin, I would love to look like that. :tup:
:tup: