Last edited:
WikiLeaks releases a classified video of US killing civilians and Reuters reporters
- Thread starter T2A`
- Start date
-
Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.
TV new people have no clue. One of the stations that just brought the news called WikiLeaks a "human rights organization". 
I watch the video.
I read the responses.
I hope humanity gets wiped out by aliens because it deserves it.
*edit*
I read the responses.
I hope humanity gets wiped out by aliens because it deserves it.
*edit*
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4495993800_4d3052835c_o.jpg
Last edited:
TV new people have no clue. One of the stations that just brought the news called WikiLeaks a "human rights organization".
Exactly what irks me so much. Wikileaks is a a political activist group that achieves their goals by leaking sensitive information to the public. However, they've fooled people into believing that they are are just a nonprofit service to allow wistleblowers to safely leak information. They want us to believe that they are an organization like wikipedia, but they seem much more like a moveon.org to me.
Well, if that ain't a US Army vehicle in the shot.
If they had any suspicion that the camera was an RPG, and then saw the guy aim STRAIGHT AT the vehicle... That's really enough to make them shoot on the journalists... Honestly, under pressure, and with the duty of protecting the ground troops, I doubt you'd act differently and say "hey, they're journalists obviously..."
It was a tragic mistake, but under the circumstances it is unreasonable to call it murder. It is an accident, simple as that.
Well, if that ain't a US Army vehicle in the shot.
If they had any suspicion that the camera was an RPG, and then saw the guy aim STRAIGHT AT the vehicle... That's really enough to make them shoot on the journalists... Honestly, under pressure, and with the duty of protecting the ground troops, I doubt you'd act differently and say "hey, they're journalists obviously..."
It was a tragic mistake, but under the circumstances it is unreasonable to call it murder. It is an accident, simple as that.
I'm not sure that this was the pic he took when he was looking around the corner, I took the info from MilitaryPhotos.net. It's just a guess.
Okay, I'm just saying if it's the picture he took. If the soldiers thought he was aiming an RPG at the vehicle, I'm betting that's reason to engage.
Of course he wasn't actually aiming an RPG. Perhaps they should upgrade the cameras with higher resolution ones?
Of course he wasn't actually aiming an RPG. Perhaps they should upgrade the cameras with higher resolution ones?
Nothing beats a good controversial video to raise funds ... especially if you add the right kind of comments.
'classified video' ... like do'h! It's not like the army releases kill-shots like this to to show how they pwned the l00sers. We already know they only show us the good stuff (like that car crossing the bridge seconds before it gets blasted to bits). Did anyone really expect them to come out and show a potentially controversial video like this ?
You don't need a conspiracy for this stuff ... simple common sense ought to do. And it should have told you that you don't show demoralizing truth to an audience that isn't exactly confident and happy about the war you're fighting.
Andd without this video the site would have been dead.
Now every little wannabe anti-conspiratorial lunatic with a tin-foil hat knows about it.
Easy pickings, easy money.
Did we really need proof that war is hell and that both sides decided to legalise murder when politics&reason failed ?
'classified video' ... like do'h! It's not like the army releases kill-shots like this to to show how they pwned the l00sers. We already know they only show us the good stuff (like that car crossing the bridge seconds before it gets blasted to bits). Did anyone really expect them to come out and show a potentially controversial video like this ?
You don't need a conspiracy for this stuff ... simple common sense ought to do. And it should have told you that you don't show demoralizing truth to an audience that isn't exactly confident and happy about the war you're fighting.
Andd without this video the site would have been dead.
Now every little wannabe anti-conspiratorial lunatic with a tin-foil hat knows about it.
Easy pickings, easy money.
Did we really need proof that war is hell and that both sides decided to legalise murder when politics&reason failed ?
Lizard Of Oz
Demented Avenger
TV new people have no clue. One of the stations that just brought the news called WikiLeaks a "human rights organization".
Bill O'Reilly told me that 4Chan is a left wing organization. And I believe him because when he isn't falafeling-up the office help, he has his finger on the pulse of America.
Lizard Of Oz
Demented Avenger
Festering Anus
Cheeto Hans
They did not follow the rules of engagement and then tried to cover up their crime. It should sicken any reasonable person.