Ok, i was going to do all your posts but i simply grew tired and i;ve said exactly the same thing in the last 6 posts or so anyway.
Yes your posts have been a positive sign of maturity, your well founded and factually based and especilally in-formative writing has enlightened us all.
My very first post:
Now don't give me that Teamwork doesn't work on publics BS as i've experienced it myself.
Another example, and i can think of many more.
Here you said it yourself and I've said exactly the same:
Now note the following words D I S C O U R A G E, discourage E N C O U R A G E, encourage. Now if you take a good look at these two words you will note that I did not say Force, you will note that in fact I said D I S C O U R A G E and E N C O U R A G E.
Note: P R O M O T E, promote. As in E N C O U R A G E, a specific kind of behaviour. Again note that they do not spell F O R C E, force.
And again. P R O M O T E, proomote. By now even you will have seen that again the word Force has not been used. It is about P R O M O T I N G a certain behaviour.
And strangely enough mine coincide with INF's. To make iNF the number one realitic Team game. Which requires the removal of frags since frags are the mortal enemy of teamwork or any other form of play exept deathmatch per my many examples but i shall repeat them all the same:
I can think of more if you are still incapable of understanding.
Yes it does whioch brings me to this point supporting the fact that frags do not belong in a game like INF.
Here you are the one forcing (F O R C I N G, note the difference with E N C O U R A G I N G and P R O M O T I N G) ME to do something. Something which in fact should not be nescessary since infiltration is a TEAM game. Guess what the primary goal is... yes strangely enough it is TEAMplay. That means that the MAIN form of playing should be TEAM-based.
Look those words again: E N C O U R A G E, and P R O M O T E. See? still no Force.
And what am I doing? I'm pointing out my opinion on the matter of scoring and why the current system wont work to reach INF's goals IE to become a realistic TEAM game.
Well if you don't like it then don't put up your "expensive" server. Nobody is forcing you to do anything. I'm sure we could find another person or company to host a server. Especially when 286 comes out many new people will come bringing many new servers. You will not be missed.
Yup ofcourse that means that you should have instant controll... maybe you are forgetting that this mod is not yours and that you have no more to say then me on how the game is developped.
You have no more to say then me or any new guy to INF.
Well if they don't like it they can play another game or come here and put up some arguements which you have completely failed to do. Your only arguement so far has been that you run a server. Well whooptie doo.
And so do I, I wnat to klnow how much I am helping the TEAM And this can be done by another system then frags. per my previous examples.
How is that a compromise? And on top of this I've allready give examples of Why FRAGS DO NOT WORK!!! Oh and here I gave a example of how you could measure your value to the team without using frags.
Oh wait I forgot you don't even want this game to be an enjoyable experience for people who "do not put up expensive servers". or are not in clan matches.
WAHAHAHAHAHAHA, uhm ok lets get real here. I have given many arguements on why teamwork cannot exist in conjuction with frags and your entire counter floats on the fact that "you set up an expensive server".
Let's see about not putting up any points, lets see how many you put up...
Any answer from you? nope.
Any takers? nope.
Still nothing, not a single reason why frags should be kept other then the fact that you like em.
I did not suggest this, you were the one that stated that you in some reason were superiour because you put up your server or whatever. I on the otherhand am incvolved in the development of this mod. No beta testers no mod, no mod nothing to waste your server on. You stated this noww you finish this.
Provided I could get enough people to support this this would by your definition automatically mean that they should obey my wishes? Because after all I am with the majority.
In fact I think the majority wanted the M60, so i guess that is what the team HAS to work on now?
Maybe you should read what has been said and see who is not comprehending what.
Yeah ofcourse All my 3000 posts were made in this thread to defend myself for your incmprehensible levels of non-recognition
If only you had done so.
See the X-com example.
You have still not brought up a single valid arguement supported bty any sort of facts or actual reasoning why we should keep frag while I have brought up reasons why NOT to keep frags. Youer entire arguement floats on the fact that you like em, oh and ofcourse the masses (whoch are irrelevant simply because they adapt to the game, not the other way around fortunately. WElse we'd still be playing pong). Oh yeah and your precious server.
"." i mean wtf? you are the one not even trying to put up an arguement.
Oh so now you are the self appointed voice for everybody else as well? Anyway I don't care how YOU play, however you will not be encouraged in your teamwork raping ways by frags.
... could you start at the beginning and read the first 500 or so lines? I have disproven EVERY single "arguement" you put up while you have not even attempted to counter any of mine.
as my friendly weird white roundfaced forum animal allready pointed out i did not railroad anything down anybodies throat. Oh and I pointed this out in the first half of this text as well. Just in case you missed it... AGAIN.
"."
Damn this wasn't even amusing you could at least have put up some sort of arguement.
Last edited:
