haha I knew someone would say something. But quite honestly, I do get around 50fps avg. 40 lowest 60/64 tops. I'll give you my system config, but I'm not really running any tweaks. I know you'll find this hard to believe by my 2 v2's got only about 5-10 fps less than my friends v3 3500 on q2 demo test.
As far as testing goes , I was just running the time demo statistics that are in UT.
Here are my system specs.
P3 450 (with the Bios turbo frequency enabled) takes it to about 466(with Norton Benchmark LOL).
128MB RAM (doesn't seem to affect UT much.
Geforce DDR
2 Voodoo2's SLI (Creative LAB 12MBs)
SB Live!
WD 18GB hard drive 7200
19" Monitor (I noticed this helped my fps alot) 1600x1200 @ 75HZ
Surround sound speakers(irrelevant but their cool! /~unreal/ubb/html/wink.gif )
Intellimouse Explorer( blah blah blah)
I think that's about all the relevant info. That's what I get with the v2's though. In quake 2 I get about 70-75 fps at 1024, and about 95 fps at 640x480. Now this will really shock you...My friend got about 103 fps in q2 at 640x480 with the exact same 2 cards (i bought them from him), and a celeron 400 (not overclocked). That one I don't even get...
But that's all my specs. Don't know how else to explain it. But from what I've seen the v2's are still the best bang for the buck. I haven't been real impressed from the v3's or even my geforce for that matter. Although the geforce runs real nice on some games(thief 2 for ex. ). The only advantage I can see with the v3's is you don't need 3 cards /~unreal/ubb/html/smile.gif
§Kokensu§