GF2 beats V5 in T&L?
Check this out!
http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=5000181&keyword_highlight=disable+T&L+
Basically, the GF2 finally lived up to what Nvidia has been saying all along, that it can outpreform the V5 in the FSAA department. Apparently the 5.32 drivers have really helped out the GF2 in FSAA. The V5's FSAA still looks a little better, but it's not the fastest in it any more.
ATI's Radeon is also interesting. It's very close to the performance of the GF2 and V5, and has the lowest price of the bunch. In fact, it demolished both the GF2 and V5 in Testdrive 6 framerates. It's also supposed to have the best non-FSAA image quality.
The interesting thing I saw in this is that in Dagoth More Zoological Gardens, which uses REALLY high polygon counts, the V5 dropped BELOW the origional GF DDR, while the Radeon stayed close to the GF2.
Check this out!
http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=5000181&keyword_highlight=disable+T&L+
Basically, the GF2 finally lived up to what Nvidia has been saying all along, that it can outpreform the V5 in the FSAA department. Apparently the 5.32 drivers have really helped out the GF2 in FSAA. The V5's FSAA still looks a little better, but it's not the fastest in it any more.
ATI's Radeon is also interesting. It's very close to the performance of the GF2 and V5, and has the lowest price of the bunch. In fact, it demolished both the GF2 and V5 in Testdrive 6 framerates. It's also supposed to have the best non-FSAA image quality.
The interesting thing I saw in this is that in Dagoth More Zoological Gardens, which uses REALLY high polygon counts, the V5 dropped BELOW the origional GF DDR, while the Radeon stayed close to the GF2.