[GU]elmur_fud;2516607 said:
Well let me explain something to you. That is all blatantly obvious. However in stating it the manner he did it was also a grammatical argument. It doesn't matter how he meant it or what the back-story is, it is still a grammatical argument. In a sense your comments make it further a grammatical argument. by describing the orrigonal grammatical tiff that spawned his grammatical attack.
Stop. Just stop. It is blatantly obvious that you completely missed the actual point and are painfully trying to cover your tracks by making up ridiculous arguments.
Let me spell it out for you. It had nothing to do with a grammatical argument. Igoy did not say anything grammatically incorrect, she simply got very angry over me saying "her" instead of saying "Igoy," so I mocked her for supposedly hating pronouns. I had taken a ridiculous frustration and moved it to an equally ridiculous hatred of pronouns, pointing out how silly her argument was.
This is not an argument over grammar, but is rather one of word choice and how we address others--grammar is related to structures of sentences. While pronouns are a part of grammar, not all uses of the word pronoun necessitates a grammatical argument. By describing the "orrigonal" context, I am letting you try and comprehend what I was saying, none of which was an attack on grammar, but rather an attack on over-dramatic expression, or in other words, it was a rhetorical argument.
You, however, did go on the grammatical attack, pointing out the TERRIBLE sin of not capitalizing the beginning to my response. In that attack, you misidentified the MLA, incorrectly criticized the usage of the word wow and had a handful of misspellings (including grammar as "grammer"). You also failed to properly capitalize the word English. You were the only person mounting a grammatical attack and you failed to properly adhere to the the strict rules of grammar this would require.
Let me recap:
1) It was a rhetorical point, not a grammatical one
2) Clarifying it only continues in the vein of rhetorical argument
3) You are having a lot of trouble in properly identifying the difference between grammar and rhetoric, so perhaps you should stop lecturing others on the issue until you have properly resolved that problem.
3) You were the person who tried to wage a grammatical argument, and you were unable to rise to the challenge.
4) Stop. You are embarrassing yourself.