Oh, I get, it, those darned Kanucks got it all wrong again. Goshdangit, Jacks, you are a hoot.
You've been grasping at straws for a while now and it's embarrassing.
Oh, I get, it, those darned Kanucks got it all wrong again. Goshdangit, Jacks, you are a hoot.
His points are probably fine... if you attribute them to the horrible "research" done for the study and not Jacks.You've been grasping at straws for a while now and it's embarrassing.
Thanks for you wonderful insight.You've been grasping at straws for a while now and it's embarrassing.
That was it. My points were that the study itself left a lot to be desired in the way of "scientific" methods, since much of the "outcome" was obviously predetermined.His points are probably fine... if you attribute them to the horrible "research" done for the study and not Jacks.
- So... this is what defunded climate "scientists" are doing now
Romney/Santorum 2012!
My thoughts exactly... For all we know that could happen.
...or just vote for the little guy's party (like Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan represented).
Although there are those that say that as long as this guy is in silent world power, heh...things won't improve at all.
Because instead of the left defending, for example, what one can see in the UN Declaration of Human Rights with conviction (ALL people have equal human and civil rights, PERIOD), it morphed into blind anti-West, double-standards and hypocrisy, even supporting Communism, Islam, anti-white people racism (inducing self-guilt as some sort of moral compensation of the past instead of actual positive remediation), and other dysfunctional ideologies.the real issue is how liberals are just as stupid for letting conservatism be as widespread as it is in the 21st century.