I'm voting Republican.

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

GotBeer?

The nozzle is now calibrating
Mar 10, 2004
2,862
0
36
57th State
I'm wondering how it's the Republicans' fault that classrooms are crowded. Did the uber-powerful teachers union start backing them when I wasn't looking?

I tried going to imvotingdemocrat.com, but it goes to this same site.
 

Crotale

_________________________ _______________
Jan 20, 2008
2,535
12
38
Anywhere But Here
I'm voting Democrat...

Because I like paying more taxes so that others don't have to work as hard as I do.

Because the Government, not me, should make the most important decisions in my life.

Because the world is going to die if we don't stop using fossil fuels right now, except for the Democrat leaders; they can continue as long as they want because they promise to stop...someday.

Because I relish in the fact that gay and lesbian marriages are extremely important to the health of our great nation and we as a people cannot survive without those blessed unions.

Because I want universal health for everyone, and I'll pay for mine and my lazy non-working neighbor too.

Because the Democrats care. At least, they say the care.

Because you don't fight wars by going to war. Instead, you send letters to your enemies telling them how bad they are and that they should stop what they are doing and hold your hand in the name of peace.

Because I want my 12 year daughter to have as many abortion as she wants, and I don't want to know about it. I mean, she is responsible for her own health care at that age, right? If not, the taxpayers will take care of it, won't they?

Because I want freedom FROM religion, even though the Constitution guarantees freedom OF religion. Who needs to abide by a 200 year old document anyways?

Because I like older men taking the time to sexually abuse my children.
 

Crotale

_________________________ _______________
Jan 20, 2008
2,535
12
38
Anywhere But Here
AFAIK, there are no ballots or initiatives or any controversy to speak of regarding inter-racial marriages. Try again, pal. I mean, Al.
 

TossMonkey

brown bread?
Sep 4, 2001
6,101
7
38
40
Great Britain.
quakeguy.tumblr.com
I'm wondering how it's the Republicans' fault that classrooms are crowded. Did the uber-powerful teachers union start backing them when I wasn't looking?

I tried going to imvotingdemocrat.com, but it goes to this same site.
The two major political parties in America are so close in views that I don't understand why you bother having votes in the first place. So that website points to the same place is no surprise to me.
 

das_ben

Concerned.
Feb 11, 2000
5,878
0
0
Teutonia
Oh I get it, the Democrats make underaged kids go at it (and probably become both pregnant and gay that way)! The party is truly a large blemish for your glorious nation.
 

TossMonkey

brown bread?
Sep 4, 2001
6,101
7
38
40
Great Britain.
quakeguy.tumblr.com
I think that's exactly the point.

I don't know if I get what people are saying but if a 12 year old is getting herself pregnant then it's the parents fault and she should be put into social care or something because her parents are failing miserably. The parents should be held accountable until the child is atleast 16.

I have digressed a little I think... I'm voting for the great old one anyway.

election08.jpg
 

Crotale

_________________________ _______________
Jan 20, 2008
2,535
12
38
Anywhere But Here
TM, the problem I was referring to is that some state have laws allowing girls who aren't even at the age of consent to have a state-funded abortion and the parents do not have to be notified. The big push behind this is alleged retaliation of the parents on to the child, or the alleged fact that a lot of these girls are knocked by dear old dad. Kind of a f*cked up couple of reasons for passing such laws, IMO. There already other laws on the books to counter these alleged issues. But hey, Democrats feel we can always benefit from more laws, amirite?
 

ilkman

Active Member
Mar 1, 2001
3,559
1
38
East coast
Inter-racial marriage and homosexual marriage are two separate, imcomparable issues; Apples and Oranges.

Inter-racial is still a man and a woman. People don't have a problem with that unless they're racist. Homosexual, as everyone knows is a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. That is the problem that people have.
 

Balton

The Beast of Worship
Mar 6, 2001
13,428
118
63
39
Berlin
That is the problem that people have.

there is a nice saying in German "look after your own dirt infront of your door".
you 'guys' don't want anyone to tell you how to live your life yet you reserve the right to tell minorities how they have to live even if what they do does not affect you except in your weird fantasies.
 

Airmoran

Construct
Nov 9, 2004
2,075
0
0
Inter-racial marriage and homosexual marriage are two separate, imcomparable issues; Apples and Oranges.

Inter-racial is still a man and a woman. People don't have a problem with that unless they're racist. Homosexual, as everyone knows is a man and a man, or a woman and a woman. That is the problem that people have.
Err... actually, you've presented a compatible set of comparable facts.

You don't have problems with interracial marriages unless you're racist. You don't have problems with homosexual marriages unless you're homophobic. You don't have problems with interracial, gay marriages unless you're either racist, homophobic, or both.

'course, not everyone opposed to gay marriages will openly admit to being homophobic. Back then people would argue that they're against repealing anti-miscegenation laws not 'cause they're racist but, for example, because either the Bible said so or that existing legal institutions were incompatible with such marriages. There's valid comparisons to be made here.

Still, it's sick that someone would propose that granting gays equal rights is unnecessary because gay couples don't absolutely need it. That's about as assbackwards as a political stance can get.
 
Last edited:

gregori

BUF Refugee
May 5, 2005
1,411
0
0
37
Baile Atha Cliath, Eireann
I don't understand why people are so against socialism when it's already a part of our country.

Social security, welfare, and the like are tax payers distributing their wealth around to everyone.


So... Why are you bitching about more socialism when you should be bitching about the stuff that's already here. :)

Not only that, there is already socialism for a small cabal of private business interests. When banks were going bust over the sub-prime mortgage crisis, the government bails them out,not the people who lost their homes.

NASA and the Millitary are practically a welfare system for companies like Boeing, Haliburton, Northrop Gruman, Raytheon etc etc Billions and Billions of public monies go to these corporations through goverment contracts to develop pretty useless weapons technologies.
 

-Jes-

Tastefully Barking
Jan 17, 2005
2,710
19
38
DM-HyperBlast
There's nothing wrong with socialism other than it hasn't worked. /shrugs

...Aaaand this is why Denmark, which is 30% socialism minimum, hasn't enjoyed high standards in almost... yeah, basically everything.. in last 40+ years or so.. :rolleyes:

[/SARCASM]

Sorry, come again?
Sure, a full socialist state can't function.. But any state incorporating select socialist methods WILL see improvements downrange.
 
Last edited:

ilkman

Active Member
Mar 1, 2001
3,559
1
38
East coast
Err... actually, you've presented a compatible set of comparable facts.

You don't have problems with interracial marriages unless you're racist. You don't have problems with homosexual marriages unless you're homophobic. You don't have problems with interracial, gay marriages unless you're either racist, homophobic, or both.

Thats assuming that a person is homophobic or racist. I am not afraid nor do I dislike gay people. I just do not agree with homosexual practice.

The best way to understand how I see things is if someone breaks a law do I have to hate them for it? No, I can still like them, I just do not agree with their breaking the law.

I do not mind inter-racial marriage either.

The problem with racism is that it assumes hating an entire racial group no matter what they do. In that way it is not completely comparable to homophobia. If a person wasn't gay would homophobia still apply? No. So its not the same.

I do not hate gay people in any way. I'll just say it again: I do not agree with their homosexual practices.

We do not all have to hate each other if we do not agree. If that is the case then the human race would probably have ceases to exist a long time ago.

Sounds backwards? Logically its not.