Space Travel and the U.S.

  • Two Factor Authentication is now available on BeyondUnreal Forums. To configure it, visit your Profile and look for the "Two Step Verification" option on the left side. We can send codes via email (may be slower) or you can set up any TOTP Authenticator app on your phone (Authy, Google Authenticator, etc) to deliver codes. It is highly recommended that you configure this to keep your account safe.

Mason

Self appointed voice of reason
Dec 14, 2000
1,216
0
0
Upstate NY
forums.unreal2.net
Not to get you started, Mojo, but could Columbus support his theory that the world was round before he journeyed forth to (ahem)'discover' America? No! You are speculating that space travel is not feasible or practical. At this current moment, you are correct, but if it weren't for the visionaries, the dreamers, then none of what we have now would exist. Flight, at one time, was a "scientific" impossibility yet now flying is one of the most used methods of travel. Hell, if I remember correctly, I read somewhere that flight, for a bumblebee, was impossible..yet there he goes, buzzing around. As for the U.S., well, we all have our opinions, don't we? Uh, moderators or whomever, could you move this to the 'Normandy' site..that is where this is supposed to be..I made a boo-boo. :)
 

the real pacman

Gwen's my hoe
Sep 1, 2000
2,044
0
0
41
So you want to go out and start to **** with some higher beings of life and just get us all ****ing killed. Smart one. Space travel is pointless. We were put on earth, and thats where we should stay.

sig.gif

I have found it!
What terrified me will terrify others;
and I need only describe the spectre
which had haunted my midnight pillow.
~Mary Shelly
 

Keiichi

Old Timer
Mar 13, 2000
3,331
0
0
Well, Pacman, that's your opinion. I don't believe we were "put" anywhere. We happened to evolve here, but I don't believe that means some higher power meant us to stay here. If everyone thought that way, we'd still be living in grass huts on the African savanah.

In any case, if the human race doesn't leave the Earth and venture out into the cosmos, then we're doomed to extinction. If global warming or a rougue asteroid don't do us in, the sun will take us with it when it goes nova in a couple million years.

-Keiichi

Sig01.JPG

http://www.geocities.com/morisato_81/

[This message was edited by Keiichi on Dec 04, 2000 at 23:30.]
 

Bad.Mojo

Commander in Chief o' the BMA
Mar 17, 2000
1,758
0
0
43
Ottawa, Ontario
Keiichi, so what if the sun busts up in a few billion (not million) years?

a) we'll probably already be extinct by then and
b) everything dies anyways. Tough luck, this whole not believing in God thing, huh?

by the way, Columbus "discovering" America didn't support his theory that the earth was round. He should have landed in India, which he didn't. All it proved, at the time, was that their was a relatively unkown continent (except to the vikings and indians)... so... whatever.

bmj.gif
 

Acey4 NA

New Member
Nov 27, 2000
662
0
0
i believe in the predictions of nostriduamis......his son[if im not mistaken]asked when the world would end,nostriduamis replied that the world would end in the year 3782 i think,thats not enough time for us to evolve to use the full capacity of our brains,to go from cave men to,well the same species,except a difference in reliogion basicly,it took about 1 million years,2 thousand years will not give the human specis a chance to survive,wich if knowing us,we will not say"space travel is useless"when the apocalipse comes,but nostriduamis also predicted that our grand childrens childrens children will colonize the star costilation of Orions Belt,if im correct,he did not predict any contact of alien races[correct me if im wrong],more than likely,even with light speed,it would take a few million years to reach the extremly far star systems,thats a man thats predictions most of the time came true,so u don't have to listen to him :rolleyes:

P.S="us"as in the human species in general

welcome to the jungle PUNK!
 

Lord_Bunker

New Member
Apr 18, 2000
1,811
0
0
Visit site
i think it was the mayans or aztecs or some body that said 2015.

and about space travel "if god had inteneded us to walk he wouldn't have given us roller skates." Willy Wonka.

tacpro-sniper2.gif

it's only temporary till i get my own ghillie finished.
 

the real pacman

Gwen's my hoe
Sep 1, 2000
2,044
0
0
41
Where the hell did god come into the picture? All I said was that I think that we are fine here. If "us" as in the human race in general would smartten the fu.ck up then there would be no global warming. There would be no pollution, there would be no famine, disease, anything harmfull. We are killing ourselves. I just don't see the point on raping this planet for what its worth and then going out to destroy another one.

<center>
<font face=verdana size=1>
<img src=http://www.planetunreal.com/redeemer/images/sig.gif>
<a href=mailto:pacman@planetunreal.com>Pacman</a>
I have found it!
What terrified me will terrify others;
and I need only describe the spectre
which had haunted my midnight pillow.
~Mary Shelly
 

Mason

Self appointed voice of reason
Dec 14, 2000
1,216
0
0
Upstate NY
forums.unreal2.net
Yes, Mojo, Columbus did get lost and ended up somewhere other than where he had expected. His whole reason for the trip..if I remember correctly..was to circumnavigate the globe in order to get to India(or was it China, school was SO long ago). I beleive the reasoning was that if the earth was indeed round instead of flat, then he could sail straight(more or less) and reach India faster than hugging the coastlines like everyone else had. Point is, he tried something most people in the "civilized" world said was impossible and he succeeded. ..and Pacman, your post makes absolutely NO sense. We were put here and that's where we should stay? That's absolutely brilliant! "Queen Isabella, I would like to search for a new route to India" .."no, Columbus, we were put here in Spain and that is where we should stay" That makes a lot of sense. Do you beleive in evolution? If so, we were originally "put" in water..is that where we should have stayed. With thinking like that we would still be living in the dark ages, praying to the moon and worshipping the seasons. Whose to say that our evolution will not lead us to "explore strange new worlds" and to "boldly go where no man has gone before". Sorry, couldn't resist that one and, NO, I am NOT a Trekkie!(although I like some of the series). For cryin' out loud, I respect every persons right to an opinion but please, at least have a real reason for it and an argument for backing it up.
 

Mason

Self appointed voice of reason
Dec 14, 2000
1,216
0
0
Upstate NY
forums.unreal2.net
...and on a humorous note. At least people respond to a halfway intelligent post in these forums. In the Delta Force forum I go to, a post like this could, very realisticly end up with a response like "go f**k yourself, space travel is stupid and so are you"..such is the mentality of some of the cretins who frequent those forums.
 

the real pacman

Gwen's my hoe
Sep 1, 2000
2,044
0
0
41
Just goes to show how much better Infiltration is compared to anything else.

<center>
<font face=verdana size=1>
<img src=http://www.planetunreal.com/redeemer/images/sig.gif>
<a href=mailto:pacman@planetunreal.com>Pacman</a>
I have found it!
What terrified me will terrify others;
and I need only describe the spectre
which had haunted my midnight pillow.
~Mary Shelly
 

Keiichi

Old Timer
Mar 13, 2000
3,331
0
0
Yeah, we "old timers" pride ourselves on the intelligence of these forums. There are a few trouble-makers that enjoy stirring sh*t up (you know who you are), but they're more of an annoyance than anything else. Inccidentally, I posted a similar thread way back in July (that seems like so long ago now) about the colonization of Mars. You can find it here.

-Keiichi

Sig01.JPG

http://www.geocities.com/morisato_81/
 

Mason

Self appointed voice of reason
Dec 14, 2000
1,216
0
0
Upstate NY
forums.unreal2.net
This is great, it takes me a week to get this many responses over at the Landwarrior site! One of the current topics over there regards some inbred looking for his stolen "fluff"(i think he is referring to navel lint). There is another that seems to be evolving into a U.S. vs. Canada battle..unfortunately the one who is on Canadas' side apparantly rides the "short bus", judging by the intelligence contained in his posts. Mojo will be glad to hear that!

Oh, and Keiichi, I am going to check that post out now, thanks.
 

Alpha_9

Infiltration lead level designer
Jun 1, 2000
1,493
0
0
54
Washington State
New thread, cool...

Hey Mason, don't worry about your "boo boo", that Normandy thread was getting too bloated, and had vastly diverged from its topic anyway... ;)

Here's my case for the necessity & viability of space travel:

1. Life is about growth. We must eventually move beyond the planet of our origin if we are to continue to grow. Or else we die. Now, some of you pessimists think the latter is our destiny. I'm an unabashed optimist who will forever disagree...

2. Life has an extraordinary ability to adapt, intelligent life even more. Humans have been able to adapt to life in more parts of the world than any other single species of animal in Earth's history, and that's as of the last ice age, where our technology was rudimentary at best. There's virtually no limit to the environments we will eventually be able to adapt to in one way or another given our technological progress. Which brings me to my third point.

3. Human technological progress mirrors the classic exponential growth pattern of life itself. Just look at our history. More progress was made from 10,000 B.C. to 1 A.D. than had been made in the previous 100,000 years of human existence. More progress was made from 1 A.D. to 1900 A.D. than had been made in the previous 10,000 years. And more progress has been made in the last 100 years than was made from 1 A.D. to 1900. That's the pattern. And barring some cataclysm (which, I know, you pessimists are counting on), the pattern will only continue.

4. Adding the 3 previous points together = space travel, on a scale no one today could possibly imagine...

The only caveat, as I mentioned above, is the assumption that a calamity of some kind won’t wipe us out. While it’s certainly a possibility, it’s far from guaranteed (as much as you pessimists may disagree). I just don’t see the point in living with the expectation that in the end it’ll all be for nothing. If that were the way all humans lived, we’d still be living in caves.

And no one would have Infiltration 3.0 to look forward to...


Alpha_9.gif


"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

John Donne
 
A

-agunzagun-

Guest
ha...

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Pacman: So you want to go out and start to **** with some higher beings of life and just get us all ****ing killed. Smart one.[/quote]

oh, brilliant! how did you ever come up with this statement? From watching Starship Troopers, ID4, and playing StarCraft and Quake 2 all in one day? :rolleyes:

I was going to post something about space travel, but it appears that Alpha already has made such message, and it pretty much eclipsed mine in terms of content and originality ( I used the Soren Kierkegaard 'house' example :( )

oh well...BTW, nice post, Alpha. :cool:

nuke1.gif


[This message was edited by Nuke! on Dec 05, 2000 at 01:57.]
 

Bad.Mojo

Commander in Chief o' the BMA
Mar 17, 2000
1,758
0
0
43
Ottawa, Ontario
1. Life is about growth. We must eventually move beyond the planet of our origin if we are to continue to grow. Or else we die. Now, some of you pessimists think the latter is our destiny. I'm an unabashed optimist who will forever disagree...

Propose HOW we move beyond our planet, please. HOW will we cope with magnetic fields changing? HOW will we cope with different gravity? HOW will we cope with un-natural ecosystems? HOW will we cope with no atmosphere? HOW will we cope with different stars and different sunlight? HOW will we cope with different temperatures.

You conveniently leave out that all growth stops eventually.

2. Life has an extraordinary ability to adapt, intelligent life even more. Humans have been able to adapt to life in more parts of the world than any other single species of animal in Earth's history, and that's as of the last ice age, where our technology was rudimentary at best. There's virtually no limit to the environments we will eventually be able to adapt to in one way or another given our technological progress. Which brings me to my third point.

Intelligence is relative. Man is not the finely tuned machine you believe him to be. We call ourselves intelligent, and on what basis?

We kill for reasons other than survival. We can teach animals our language, and how to communicate with us, yet nobody has been able to successfully understand their modes of communication. Maybe opposable thumbs? All simians have them. Tool using? Again, can't credit us with that.

What, then, makes us intelligent? What makes us adaptable. The human body is about the most unadaptable biological specimen in the world. Case in point, if you take a white man and stick him in the sub-saharan region, you can guarantee yourself he'll end up with skin cancer. Why? Because he's white. Rabits change the colour of their fur, but our skin is wholly unable to adapt to varying degrees of sunlight. Instead it cracks, peels, becomes tumourous. Hurray for mankind!

3. Human technological progress mirrors the classic exponential growth pattern of life itself. Just look at our history. More progress was made from 10,000 B.C. to 1 A.D. than had been made in the previous 100,000 years of human existence. More progress was made from 1 A.D. to 1900 A.D. than had been made in the previous 10,000 years. And more progress has been made in the last 100 years than was made from 1 A.D. to 1900. That's the pattern. And barring some cataclysm (which, I know, you pessimists are counting on), the pattern will only continue.

Yep. Progress. You know, like putting holes in the ozone and leaving irradiated craters all over the place. Good for progress. You want to bar the cataclysm? Bar mankind.

4. Adding the 3 previous points together = space travel, on a scale no one today could possibly imagine...

Yes, because that scale will be disastrous. Long space travel = inbreeding. Geomagnetic poles = fu'cked up nervous system. Gravity = crushed or extremely brittle, poreous bones. No atmosphere = no breathing. No delicate, balanced ecosystem = EVERYBODY F'UCKING DIES.

bmj.gif
 

Mason

Self appointed voice of reason
Dec 14, 2000
1,216
0
0
Upstate NY
forums.unreal2.net
Again, Mojo, you cling to the assumption that just because the technology doesn't exist today, it will never exist. That, my friend, is a very archaic thought process. In the 1950's, landing on the moon was looked at as impossible because the technology didn't exist. Hell, flight was supposed to be impossible as well.

Alpha, great post. I was getting ready to use the exponential growth of man myself..good call. Mojo, again you argue Alphas' point with "ok, then, tell me how". That argument doesn't stand. I don't even pretend to know HOW a lot of things work but they still do. I don't quite understand how all that explosive propulsion fuel for the shuttle doesn't blow it up constantly upon liftoff but guess what..psst..the shuttle still takes off and comes back safely(well..most of the time).

Growth does not stop, everything keeps moving forward and evolving. Even when a species becomes extinct, growth does not stop. Correct me if I'm wrong but there are a few species out there that have been around fow thousands, if no millions of years. Sharks, for one, they have evolved by becoming a bit smaller and not requiring quite so much food to survive. There are numerous members of the lizard species that still bear some ties to the dinosaurs. Growth on this planet will not stop unless we completlely obliterate ourselves..and even then it won't be becuse of mother nature.

Now as far as intelligence, Dolphins are extremely intelligent..can they survive out of water..I think not. We, on the other hand can, with the use of our "non-intelligent" technology, go into the water for increasingly long periods of time. OK, I admit it, Dolphins have no means to improve themselves because they have no way to make things. I am sorry for picking on you, Flipper. Intelligence is not completely relative..brain size has just a 'teensy' bit to do with it, don't ya think? Is it coincidence that the smartest creatures also have the largest brains in proportion to their bodies? I think not. Intelligence means that the guy dropped in the sahara desert will bring wiht him the means to survive, where an animal has no such option or ability. I think what you are referring to is instinct and that is something COMPLETLY different. Physically, we are weaker than most species, what makes us intelligent is our ability to use our brains to adapt and overcome, not to be a slave to instinct.


Space travel causing inbreeding? C'mon, you have to be kidding me! Helllloooo..anyone there? Sperm banks? That alone can solve most of the inbreeding problem. If you start out with enough people and a diverse gene pool, then that shouldn't be a problem. Hell, trailer parks still flourish!(albeit, not very intelligently). In any event, upon examining your argument, I find that there is no real merit in it. Unless we destroy ourselves, space travel will be a FACT, and probably sooner that most would guess. Personally, I think you(Mojo) just like to stir up the pot..which is good because it makes for some stimulating discussion.
 

I_ABuGa

Vetran
Apr 27, 2000
1,442
0
0
Malaysia
Visit site
Mason, so you know, Mojo.the.bad is exactly that "bad". Take his words with a little salt and dont let him tick you off. He's a little antagonistic and it could be his strategy to winning fights by pissing people off royally. :D :D :D

I personally find his view very interesting. It not only shows me a very different way of looking at things but also teaches me how to tongue-lash people in real life.
 

Alpha_9

Infiltration lead level designer
Jun 1, 2000
1,493
0
0
54
Washington State
And the debate goes on...

Mason did a good job rebutting Mojo's rebuttal of my post. I'll add a few more things:

1. I can no more describe how we'll do all the things necessary to colonize space any more than Thomas Jefferson, with all his brilliance, could have described how, less than 2 centuries in the future, people would be travelling from New York to London in under 3 hours. As Mason says, it just doesn't work that way. But we have history to look at, and a simple extrapolation into the future tells us we ain't seen nothin' yet...

As for growth always coming to an end, that's only true for closed systems. If we remain stuck on Earth, then our's is certainly a closed system, and our growth would indeed end. That's why we need to become a space-faring species.

2. You argue humans aren't intelligent, at least not in a way fundamentally different from animals such a chimps, or dolphins. I actually agree with you there. What does differentiate us is the degree of our intelligence, and our ability to develop technology. Chimps fashion twigs to poke into termite mounds so they can pull out a tasty treat (well, at least for them). Humans create 1 ghz computer processors that can crunch a billion numbers per second.

The adaptability of humans doesn't come from our bodies, as with animals. It comes from our brains. We adapt by learning to build fires, igloos, coats, sunblock, sun glasses, weapons... We adapt by learning to domesticate animals. We adapt by learning to plan for the future. Our bodies are weak and vulnerable. Yet we are the most potent species the planet has ever known. Because of our intelligence.

3. No one said our technology doesn't have a few bugs. But that doesn't mean it ain't progress. I'd say the ability to cure small pox, or send a robotic probe to the surface of Mars, is certainly progress. As for irradiated craters, well, as far as I know no one has produced any of those in about 40 years...

4. Naysayers to human progress have been proven wrong time and time again throughout history. You'd think they'd eventually learn...

Now, whether Mojo.the.Curmudgeon is as genuinely pessimistic as he claims to be about everything, I suppose only he knows. But it's certainly fun to debate him! :D


Alpha_9.gif


"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

John Donne

[This message was edited by {PhD}Alpha_9 on Dec 05, 2000 at 12:41.]
 

Bad.Mojo

Commander in Chief o' the BMA
Mar 17, 2000
1,758
0
0
43
Ottawa, Ontario
You somehow seem to believe that non-existent things support your arguement. I just want one supporting arguement, its not alot to ask for. Its a simple statement I'm asking for, not a complex thesis.

Why do you believe mankind can move beyond this solar system? I have presented historical trends and scientific fact to support myself, yet the only things you have presented is "because you think it can't be done means it CAN be done" -- that just doesn't fly. It doesn't work that way. You need to back up what you say with some facts. You don't have any. Your only claim to fact is, "the technology doesn't exist to avert every scientific law of physics and biology you've claimed to support, but it will because we discovered electricity and sent men to the moon." Please.

Just back it up with something, ANYTHING. Hey, speaking of the exponential growth of life, anybody remember this species of animal called dinosaurs? They were an expansive, dominant species, and now we can't even agree on what the colour of their scales were. Sure, we can say sharks and gators are related to the prehistoric era -- but so were small simian like creatures -- should we then assume as right that because a) life grows exponentially and b) because we are the dominant species that we can freely negate c) the dominant species always has a history of being overthrown, in every facet and aspect of life, by a lesser entity, be it i) the dinosaurs dying off to make way for tiny, tiny mammals, ii) a tiny virus killing a much larger living thing or, iii) a tiny nation toppling an empire? I don't think so.

Speaking of adaptability and intelligence, I've already said opposable thumbs/tool using aren't a fair measure of intelligence -- they're instinctual, no higher learning needed. You claim dolphins can't survive out of water (which is partially true, they do breath oxygen instead of diffusing it, but they do need to be kept wet) and men can -- and thus they have a lesser capacity for intelligence. How so? Put a dolphin on a beach, naked, and a man submerged in water, naked, and see which dies first. The man will drown before the dolphin suffocates. Give the same sort of tools to a dolphin that you give to a man, and adapt them for the dolphin, and the dolphin will demonstrate the same capability of survival through tool using (albeit his inability to create tools) that man can demonstrate.

As for sperm banks, that's fairly pointless -- whether the sperm is fresh or frozen, it still carries the potential to spread malignant chromosomes. Recessive genes, as hot as our siblings may be, are a bad thin

bmj.gif