PDA

View Full Version : New Invention will change the world.. but what is "IT"


Spleen
9th Jan 2001, 05:05 PM
This is an article I read online.. though it very interesting.. cant wait to see what "it" is.


Invention said to be bigger than PCs and the Internet

By PJ Mark
INSIDE.COM

Jan. 9 — Harvard Business School Press executive editor Hollis Heimbouch has just paid $250,000 for a book about IT — but neither the editor nor the agent, Dan Kois of The Sagalyn Literary Agency, knows what IT is.

ALL THEY DO know: IT, also code-named Ginger, is an invention developed by 49-year-old scientist Dean Kamen, and the subject of a planned book by journalist Steve Kemper. According to Kemper’s proposal, IT will change the world, and is so extraordinary that it has drawn the attention of technology visionaries Jeff Bezos and Steve Jobs and the investment dollars of pre-eminent Silicon Valley venture capitalist John Doerr, among others.
Kemper — who has been published in Smithsonian, National Geographic and Outside among others — has had exclusive access to Kamen and the engineers at his New Hampshire-based research and development company, DEKA, for the past year and a half. He tags the proposed book as Soul of the New Machine meets The New New Thing and won over his agent and publisher with e-mails describing the project in carefully couched language. He also included an amusing narrative of a meeting between Bezos, Jobs, Doerr and Kamen.
In the proposal, Doerr calls Kamen — who was just awarded the National Medal of Technology, the country’s highest such award — a combination of Henry Ford and Thomas Edison. Doerr also says, a touch ominously, that he had been sure that he wouldn’t see the development of anything in his lifetime as important as the World Wide Web — until he saw IT. According to the proposal, another investor, Credit Suisse First Boston, expects Kamen’s invention to make more money in its first year than any start-up in history, predicting Kamen will be worth more in five years than Bill Gates. Jobs told Kamen the invention would be as significant as the PC, the proposal says.


And though there are no specifics in the proposal as to what the invention is, there are some tantalizing clues. Is IT an energy source? Some sort of environmentally friendly personal transport device? One editor who saw the proposal went as far as to speculate — jokingly (perhaps) — that IT was a type of personal hovering craft.
Consider the following items, culled from the proposal:
IT is not a medical invention.
In a private meeting with Bezos, Jobs and Doerr, Kamen assembled two Gingers — or ITs — in 10 minutes, using a screwdriver and hex wrenches from components that fit into a couple of large duffel bags and some cardboard boxes.
The invention has a fun element to it, because once a Ginger was turned on, Bezos started laughing his “loud, honking laugh”.
There are possibly two Ginger models, named Metro and Pro — and the Metro may possibly cost less than $2,000.
Bezos is quoted as saying that IT “...is a product so revolutionary, you’ll have no problem selling it. The question is, are people going to be allowed to use it?”
Jobs is quoted as saying: “...If enough people see the machine you won’t have to convince them to architect cities around it. It’ll just happen.”
Kemper says the invention will “sweep over the world and change lives, cities, and ways of thinking.”
The “core technology and its implementations” will, according to Kamen, “have a big, broad impact not only on social institutions but some billion-dollar old-line companies.” And the invention will “profoundly affect our environment and the way people live worldwide. It will be an alternative to products that are dirty, expensive, sometimes dangerous and often frustrating, especially for people in the cities.”
IT will be a mass-market consumer product “likely to run afoul of existing regulations and or inspire new ones,” according to Kemper. The invention will also likely require “meeting with city planners, regulators, legislators, large commercial companies and university presidents about how cities, companies and campuses can be retro-fitted for Ginger.”
The invention itself is as interesting as the inventor. Kamen — “a true eccentric, cantankerous and opinionated, a great character,” according to the proposal — dropped out of college in his 20s, then invented the first drug infusion pump; he later created the first portable insulin pump and dialysis machine.
Kamen, an avid aviator who commutes via a helicopter, is also the founder of FIRST — For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology — a nonprofit organization that encourages young people to pursue studies and careers in math and science. He’s a single man obsessed with his work and out of touch with popular culture. According to the proposal, Kamen was seated at a White House dinner next to two people he’d never heard of: Shirley MacLaine and Warren Beatty.


Kamen’s most recent invention is the iBot, an off-road wheelchair that can climb stairs, cover sand and gravel and rise to balance on two wheels. A prototype iBot was showcased by wheelchair-bound journalist John Hockenberry at least year’s TED conference in Monterrey, Calif.; the demonstration was greeted by wild applause.
IT/Ginger won’t be revealed until 2002, the proposal says. No one has seen the project except Kamen, Kemper, the engineers and the investors — which include Doerr, a partner in the venture capital firm of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which helped launch Netscape, Amazon, Juniper Networks, Excite, and @Home, among others; and Michael Schmertzler, managing director of Credit Suisse First Boston. Others who have seen the invention and signed confidentiality agreements include minor investors Paul Allaire, CEO of Xerox; and Vern Loucks, recently retired CEO of Baxter. Bezos, Jobs and writer/venture capitalist Randy Komisar sit on the advisory board. Kamen retains 85 percent of his new company, according to the proposal.
Why the secrecy? Kamen fears, as he states in a letter to Kemper that is included in the proposal, that “huge corporations” might catch wind of the invention and “use their massive resources to erect obstacles against us or, worse, simply appropriate the technology by assigning hundreds of engineers to catch up to us, and thousands of employees to produce it in their plants.”
But such secrecy may have been enough to turn publishers away. “The Internet changed the world, too” said one editor who considered the project, “but books about it don’t really sell.” As for the quarter-million-dollar price tag for North American rights: on the one hand, it doesn’t seem to be a lot for a book about an invention which has mesmerized such well-known technology moguls. On the other, $250,000 is a lot to pay for a story about a product that hasn’t been seen, defined or named.
“We were well aware of Kamen,” says book editor Heimbouch, who says she’s been publishing in this technology circle for a long time.” (The bestselling The Monk and the Riddle: The Education of a Silicon Valley Entrepreneur by Komisar is hers.) So jumping on board for the book wasn’t such a dilemma. Besides, says Heimbouch, Harvard Business School Press had intended to approach Kamen about doing a book anyway. “He’s an inventor of great technologies that make people’s lives better,” she says.
Harvard Business School Press, a division of Harvard Business School Publishing, is a wholly owned , not for profit subsidiary of Harvard University. The Sagalyn Agency retains all but North American rights to the book.

StalkingViper
9th Jan 2001, 05:59 PM
Now i gotta wait a whole year to find out what IT is? I hate waiting. Lmao. ;)

I_ABuGa
10th Jan 2001, 10:52 AM
Let's make a bet which will come first; INF 2.85(perhaps 3.0) or IT. heheheh. ;)

Catalyst
10th Jan 2001, 05:43 PM
A lot of people seem to agree that it's some form of transportation, possibly a low-emission, highly fuel-efficient scooter that constantly balances itself based on which why you are leaning, i.e. lean forward and the thing goes forward so you won't fall off...

<FONT SIZE=2 color="#A5AA56">Catalyst</FONT>

dolce916
10th Jan 2001, 08:17 PM
I recall reading an artical about Dean in the Smithsonian back in 94.
VERY interesting guy...when he was 19 he invented a digital I-V control unit(medical invention) that made him millions out of his parents basement and garage.

He then went on to buy I believe it was Bell helicopter..or one of the other major helicopter companies.
He invented the original "battle bots" with an organization that spurred mechanical engineering and scientific studies among high school students with a national competition.
He owns an island off the coast of Conneticut where he claims to be the Baron of the only Scientificly literate society. (his island)

Just a down right intriguing guy.

So I have no doubt he has come up with something major.

You also will never see him in a suit.

do you have the link to the article handy?

<img src="http://www.bulwark2000.com/images/danger10.jpg" width="225" height="125">

Spleen
10th Jan 2001, 09:19 PM
I found it on inside.com

Ballistophobia
11th Jan 2001, 08:27 AM
Found this on MSNBC:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Imagine a vehicle that uses no fuel, has no engine,
battery, transmission, steering wheel and no driver. IT
makes certain occupations and places obsolete (Truck
drivers, Gas Stations, etc) and IT runs on a common
kinetic energy source. IT also will make traffic lights
obsolete and may even function as a secondary utility
source.
What IT is (Intelligent Transportation) is a
revolutionary new device that uses a hydraulic/magnetic
device for propulsion of vehicles. The purchasable,
private part of IT does have wheels (no, it doesn't
float; the energy requirements for such a device are too
high!) and IT has a very simple assembly, consisting of a
cab and a large "needle" pointing into the earth
below ground level that will drag the cab around. The
needle will have a ferrous material at it's tip, along
with several bearings/wheels to control friction. The
"needle" will slide into a slit in the middle of
the lane in a road, much like the needle of a record
player. However, this is only the small,
"private" and purchasable part of IT. The
'needle' will come in contact with smooth plastic pipes
embedded in the road carrying fast flowing water
(possibly even drinking water) circulated by
high-capacity water pumps. Within these pipes, there will
be long, thin (about the diameter of the pipe)
electromagnetic devices that are free-moving in the pipe
(we’ll use the euphemism ‘fish' because that is what they
are shaped like) and will flow with the current. These
devices will create a magnetic field that will extend out
of the pipe, and the ferrous 'needle' mentioned before
will be attracted to this field. As the 'fish' is pushed
by the current of running water, it will pull the
'needle' (and the car attached to it) along with it. The
'fish' and needle never come into direct contact- the
pipe is the barrier between them. When the car leaves the
road for a permanent stop, the 'fish' will turn off the
electromagnet and continue to move through the pipe until
it finds the next vehicle (You don't have a 'fish'
permanently assigned to a particular car). This whole
package will be integrated with a citywide traffic
controlling system (Computers, sensors, switches and
other miscellaneous stuff- Why he needs the help of Steve
Jobs and technology in general), eliminating the need for
a driver and traffic control. This eliminates traffic
jams also, because problem areas will automatically be
rerouted around. There are other boring details I won't
bother with (Like stopping, recharging the 'fish' while
stopping and using the water current, inter city travel,
etc.) but the system is already being successfully tested
as a prototype. The whole affair will look something like
slot cars, but they will be pulled by the track and not
have a motor in them. The efficiencies will be much
higher than the current combustion engines because you
aren't dragging round the extra weight of an energy
source, transmission, and other related items. Automobile
accidents will be rare due to this "intelligent"
system eliminating human error. Considering the previous
inventions (Drug infusion PUMP, portable insulin PUMP,
dialysis machine, and iBot the wheelchair), this
invention is completely in line with his previous
(hydraulic and transportation) ones. It also requires the
enormous sums of money that certain venture capitalists
can give him, and legislators, city planners and other
individuals to work together to make it a reality.

IT will destroy many corporations, most notably big oil
and car companies. The patents used here for a cheap,
fuel-less vehicle will make Kamen the most wealthy man on
earth at the expense of these companies and individuals.
However, he will save the American people trillions of
dollars and re-ignite our sagging economy with cheap,
reliable transportation, and he will make affordable
zero-emissions vehicles a reality.

Q: It only took him 10 minutes to assemble with
screwdrivers!
A: He’s using a small scale model with permanent magnets
as the ‘fish’. Most competent children can assemble a
train model in 10 minutes. However, laying down (real)
track is a whole different matter....

Q: Different versions of IT (Metro, etc.)?
A: Make the cab larger. (More passengers.)

Q: Wouldn’t that require huge investments by cities?
A: Cites are already strewn with underground pipes
(Water, sewer, gas) and cable (Electric, television,
telecommunications). One more near-surface set is pricey,
but it would cost as much as any other lines.

Q: I have to wait for these ‘fish’ to pick me up?
A: There will be plenty of these shuttling devices
(fishes) in the pipes (many more then there will be
vehicles). The technology for these is relatively cheap.
Wait times should be minimal.

Q: Where does the pump electricity come from?
A: The pumps will be run in the cities, using
electricity. This is why city planners are needed for
this project. (And yes, they will need lots of
electricity, but in the long run it is much more
efficient than the millions of small, heavy power plants
used now)

Q: My environment is poor for IT! (lacks water, cold,
snow, etc.)
A: The system can be set up to be independent of water
supply, and watertight in the necessary environment. The
movement of the fish will keep ice from forming, and
plows will be dragged over the road (being pulled by the
shuttling devices), providing the added benefit of cheap
snowplowing service."
[/quote]

Hmmmm.

I_ABuGa
11th Jan 2001, 10:31 AM
woot!
now that would be interesting.

Spleen
11th Jan 2001, 11:44 AM
This is nothing new then... Basically its the old "robot car" invention.. Its old. This has been proposed many many times in many cities, just using a different source of power. Main problems included.

People DONT WANT to be slave to the stupid fish. They want the freedom to drive where they want when they want. Why is this new invention any better or "revolutionary" than city buses???! Its simply powered by a different fuel source and the cabs are smaller?? THe restrictions are the same!!! NO there will always be people who say.. I want to be able to go where there are no fish.

The cost is prohibitive. Basically your talking you an enormous amount of money. The cost of which is paid by WHOM? Thats what I thought. ANd who gets rich???


Too many people will be out of work. OK so lets take every automobile worker.. the transportation unions, the oil companies, every industry that contributes to these industries and tell them we are developing a substitution for your job.. Thanks and see ya.. I DONT THINK SO. The backlash and job loss would be so high I really dont see this going on a national level.. Sure maybe a few treehugging cities like seattle might try it but never on a national level without major economic depression secondary to massive job loss.


Again.. Robot highways have been tried and the basic flaw is PEOPLE DONT WANT THEM. Tell me.. is there ANYONE reading this who wants to give up their car (if you have obne already) for some pod that gets towed around by am extraneous power source???? And what about those of you who rarely use a car.. do you really want to foot the bill for others who do??? I assume the infrastructure for this huge undertaking will be paid by all in the form of TAXES.

Again, Im a huge futurist and optimist.. but this will never fly. (too many people like me out there!!