PDA

View Full Version : Non Sequitur kicks so much ass.


TheShiningWizard
11th Feb 2004, 06:02 AM
Check this out :lol: :tup:

Derelan
11th Feb 2004, 06:54 AM
bahahahahahaha

GenoOfTheCrayon
11th Feb 2004, 05:06 PM
I can't read it. Either my eyes need to be checked, or it's WAY too small.

TheShiningWizard
11th Feb 2004, 05:44 PM
I'd go with "eyes need to be checked." That, or you need stop running 1600x1200 on a 14 inch monitor :p

MetalMickey
11th Feb 2004, 06:48 PM
its pretty small

anaemic
12th Feb 2004, 01:32 AM
its pretty small, and then pretty suck when you do make it out ;)

Wolf Being
12th Feb 2004, 02:56 AM
Ouch, "busted", indeed, hehe :lol:

I agree, Non Sequitur is king. I almost prefer them to Gary Larson (*gasp*).

And it's a thumbnail, guys. Click on it.

RaekwoN
12th Feb 2004, 03:17 AM
Larson's funny...but then there is Wulffmorgenthaler...Larson...on crack.

http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/log/SS21122003.gif
http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/

MetalMickey
12th Feb 2004, 10:33 AM
And it's a thumbnail, guys. Click on it.

heh. I think we know that. The image itself is small and difficult to read.

Dr_Strangelove
12th Feb 2004, 11:28 AM
umm.. no? It shouldn't be. You on a ****ty monitor at 1600x1200? I am at 1600x1200 and can read some of the text at the bottom

EDIT: Simple test. does it look like this image has individual black and white lines, or are the gray lines, or do you simply see medium gray?

http://www.jeremycox.com/stuff/monitor_test.gif

das_ben
12th Feb 2004, 12:18 PM
1024x768.

Hadmar
12th Feb 2004, 01:24 PM
reaper, click on the thumbnail :p

OK that's odd. The pic is normal readable size now and at work it was realy tiny and hard to read. Both 1024*768, 17" at work 19" at home but that's to much of a difference to explain it with monitor size. I use Firebird 0.7 at work and Mozilla 1.6 at home... but ... nah, just odd.

Dr_Strangelove
12th Feb 2004, 02:08 PM
1) yes, click on it. :p

2) showing me a screen capture proves nothing. That will capture every pixel on the screen, even if your monitor can't display it correctly. We are debating the accuracy of the monitor, not the graphics card. A better way to do it would be to take a digital photo of your screen.

Derelan
12th Feb 2004, 02:48 PM
EDIT: Simple test. does it look like this image has individual black and white lines, or are the gray lines, or do you simply see medium gray?



those look like a gray blur whether or not its on the computer or printed at 640dpi
:(

anaemic
12th Feb 2004, 03:05 PM
looks like black and white lines on a 19inch monitor at 1600 x 1200

although it looks gay and buggy and annoying when i scroll up or down

das_ben
13th Feb 2004, 11:32 AM
Errr sorry, I thought people were discussing whether the attachment preview is large enough to be read. I'm getting old or something.

MetalMickey
13th Feb 2004, 11:44 AM
Simple test. does it look like this image has individual black and white lines, or are the gray lines, or do you simply see medium gray?

I can see the individual lines. I run 1024*768 on an average CRT monitor.

The image is slightly difficult to read. Eyesight is obviously a factor, but the contrast between the black text and the white background puts a strain on the eyes.