I agree with the idea of what the guy is saying, but not the manner in which he is delivering the message.
Sure, US laws now limit civilian owned weapons to .50 cal or smaller. Do civilians really need a .50 cal sniper rifle? For what purpose???
That's not really the point. The point is, this is a foot in the door. Get everyone to agree that no one really needs a .50 cal weapon and that they can be banned. That's a small step. The next small step might be to ban shotguns or large caliber pistols. Don't really need those, right? It's a slippery slope, my friends. And before you know it, BB guns will be illegal.
(Wether or not that's a good thing is debatable)
Oh, and he mentions
a Barrett sniper rifle in his letter and then has a picture of a truck with mounted dual .50s? What sense does that make? And frankly, seeing a hill billy with mounted dual .50s in the back of his pickup scares even me!
Matthew